On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 11:08, Juan Nin wrote: > The "good" or "not good" depends on each person...
Well, yes. There is "proper" also. > There's always debate on this topic on every mailing-list, where > some people claim one way is the "correct" or "better" one, and some > people claim it's the other one, and each of them have their good > reasons... Search on google and you'll find tons of topics on this > matter, and you will be able to see the different opinions about it. <no offense> I'm subscribed to different mailing lists for more than fifteen years and I don't have to search google about that subject, IMHO. </no offense> > At the end of the day, it's the decision of the list owners, and I'm > sure that they have already thought about this and that they won't > change their mind. :) Agreed. But, when some random user ask how to reply "canonical way" I don't think it is rude to tell about "reply to list" option if MUA support that. > Regards. > > > On 8/21/11 7:54 AM, Milan P. Stanic wrote: > >On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 18:10, Wendy William wrote: > >>When I do reply any Kannel mail then "To" field filled by sender, not by > >>users@kannel.org. This is not good since we must use Reply All that caused > >>double messages. > >Check your e-mail client software and see if it have "reply to list" (or > >something similar) option. > > > >Kannel mailing lists works quite well with "normal" e-mail clients. > > > -- Kind regards, Milan -------------------------------------------------- Arvanta, IT Security http://www.arvanta.net Please do not send me e-mail containing HTML code.
