I got this complain :)

--------------------------
> Next time, always copy the  users list.

> 
> == Rene
--------------------------
Current Kannel mailing settings caused:
1. I got 2 emails for SAME EMAIL !!! 1 from Rene and 1 form kannel.org
2. I must click Replay to All, because klik to Reply only send to Rene
3. Wasting time, wasting bandwidth
4. How do I filter mail from Rene to be deleted because I have got same email 
from kannel behind Rene (also other users) ?

So, I hope the moderator change the mailing list setting to avoid this 
complain, 
please ...
 
Regards, Wendy




----- Original Message ----
> From: Milan P. Stanic <m...@arvanta.net>
> To: users@kannel.org
> Sent: Mon, August 22, 2011 3:00:19 PM
> Subject: Re: Wrong setting on Kannel Mailing List?
> 
> Hi Juan,
> 
> On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 20:02, Juan Nin wrote:
> > Milan, I  don't take it as an offense at all, not sure what you
> > understood with my  reply, but it was not directed to you at all, was
> > directed to Wendy the  original poster  :)
> 
> Sorry for my bad English.
> 
> I didn't want  to say that you offended me. I put <no offense> tag to
> tell that I  don't want to offend you. :)
> 
> > On 8/21/11 3:55 PM, Milan P. Stanic  wrote:
> > >On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 11:08, Juan Nin wrote:
> >  >>The "good" or "not good" depends on each person...
> > >Well,  yes. There is "proper" also.
> > >
> > >>There's always debate  on this topic on every mailing-list, where
> > >>some people claim one  way is the "correct" or "better" one, and some
> > >>people claim it's  the other one, and each of them have their good
> > >>reasons...  Search on google and you'll find tons of topics on this
> > >>matter,  and you will be able to see the different opinions about it.
> > ><no  offense>
> > >I'm subscribed to different mailing lists for more than  fifteen years
> > >and I don't have to search google about that subject,  IMHO.
> > ></no offense>
> > >
> > >>At the end of  the day, it's the decision of the list owners, and I'm
> > >>sure that  they have already thought about this and that they won't
> > >>change  their mind.   :)
> > >Agreed. But, when some random user ask how to  reply "canonical way" I
> > >don't think it is rude to tell about "reply  to list" option if MUA
> > >support that.
> > >
> >  >>Regards.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>On 8/21/11  7:54 AM, Milan P. Stanic wrote:
> > >>>On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 18:10,  Wendy William wrote:
> > >>>>When I do reply any Kannel mail  then "To" field filled by sender, not 
by
> > >>>>users@kannel.org. This is not good since we  must use Reply All that 
>caused
> > >>>>double messages.
> >  >>>Check your e-mail client software and see if it have "reply to list"  
(or
> > >>>something similar) option.
> > >>>
> >  >>>Kannel mailing lists works quite well with "normal" e-mail  clients.
> > >>>
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Kind  regards,   Milan
> --------------------------------------------------
> Arvanta, IT  Security        http://www.arvanta.net
> Please do not send  me e-mail containing HTML code.
> 
> 

Reply via email to