On Mon, 19 Jun 2017 10:03:35 -0700
Gordon Messmer <gordon.mess...@gmail.com> wrote:

> As a minor point, I'd mention that Fedora's default umask is 002, not 
> 022, except for the root user.

Thanks.

> I think either is fine.  umask governs how you share files with other 
> authorized users of the local computer system (where "local" is
> defined as all hosts sharing the same user database).  I only share
> computing systems with people that I want to work with, so the
> default umask of 002 is entirely appropriate.

How much damage would it do to you if their accounts were compromised?

> That 
> phrase brings to mind an increase in malware, which is a concern, but 
> not one that umask can affect in any way.  If malware makes its way
> on to your workstation, it's almost certainly running under your
> account. It has exactly the same permission as any one of your other
> processes. umask doesn't change that.

Good point.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to