On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 7:22 AM Go Canes <letsgonhlcan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 12:18 AM Ed Greshko <ed.gres...@greshko.com> > wrote: > > > > On 28/03/2022 11:33, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > > Is it really just me? I see various people responding. Do you > actually understand what his setup is? It doesn't make any sense at all to > me. > > > > It is not only you. I haven't grasped the setup either. > > > > However, I would note that everything was working for him the way he > wanted until his Broadband supplier > > replaced the Cable Modem. > > I've been reluctant to contribute as well, due to not really > understanding the setup. But given the Cable Modem was replaced, I've > been wondering if this is as simple as the prior modem being in > "bridge mode" - i.e. passing all traffic without usingg NAT or routing > i had thought of using the firewalls of both the ATT rtr & NH firewalls passing through http & https. also i thought bridge mode wsa a security risk??? > - and the new modem needs to be reconfigured? > att came on site and reconfigured the bgw210700 to its setup as I bought the static ip & isp service, i expect they have it properly set, But! as you see i am over my head... last year this time, i had a pace 5238ac in the at&t rtr role. as the result of a mid february sserive upgrade/rtr replacement. i needed more wifi service so i bought the nighthawk thinking to cascade the NH behind(required) arris bgw210700. in last years config, i had all traffic routed through the ATT and did port mapping from the internet from static ip external to internal network(10.0.0.0) on the NH. 10.0.0.0 was not shared with the public subnet and it all just worked. tracing ip's & networks, i get... 108.90.204.1 isp GW 108.90.204.76 isp ATT rtr (WAN side) 192.168.1.254 ATT rtr access (LAN side) 10.0.0.1 NH GW (NH LAN ) 10.0.0.101 (aka 108.220.213.121) WS srvr. is this an unreasonable configuration given my goal? it was also asked what networks i used to transition public subnet to private subnet as, ... 192.168.1.0 to 10.0.0.0 > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure >
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
