On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 7:22 AM Go Canes <letsgonhlcan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 12:18 AM Ed Greshko <ed.gres...@greshko.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 28/03/2022 11:33, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > > Is it really just me?  I see various people responding.  Do you
> actually understand what his setup is?  It doesn't make any sense at all to
> me.
> >
> > It is not only you.  I haven't grasped the setup either.
> >
> > However, I would note that everything was working for him the way he
> wanted until his Broadband supplier
> > replaced the Cable Modem.
>
> I've been reluctant to contribute as well, due to not really
> understanding the setup.  But given the Cable Modem was replaced, I've
> been wondering if this is as simple as the prior modem being in
> "bridge mode" - i.e. passing all traffic without usingg NAT or routing
>

i had thought of using the firewalls of both the ATT rtr & NH firewalls
passing through
http & https. also i thought bridge mode wsa a security risk???


> - and the new modem needs to be reconfigured?
>

att came on site and reconfigured the bgw210700 to its setup
as I bought the static ip & isp service,
i expect they have it properly set, But!
as you see i am over my head...

last year this time,   i had a pace 5238ac in the at&t rtr role.
as the result of a mid february sserive upgrade/rtr replacement.

i needed more wifi service so i bought the nighthawk thinking to cascade
the NH behind(required)
arris bgw210700. in last years config, i had all traffic routed through the
ATT and did port mapping from the internet
from static ip external to internal network(10.0.0.0) on the NH.

10.0.0.0 was not shared with the public subnet and it all just worked.

tracing ip's & networks, i get...

108.90.204.1       isp GW
108.90.204.76     isp ATT rtr (WAN side)

192.168.1.254     ATT rtr access (LAN side)

10.0.0.1               NH  GW   (NH LAN )

10.0.0.101  (aka 108.220.213.121)  WS srvr.

is this an unreasonable configuration given my goal?

it was also asked what networks i used to transition public subnet to
private subnet as, ...

192.168.1.0 to 10.0.0.0


> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to