On 3/28/22 12:10, Jack Craig wrote:
i needed more wifi service so i bought the nighthawk thinking to cascade
the NH behind(required)
arris bgw210700. in last years config, i had all traffic routed through
the ATT and did port mapping from the internet
from static ip external to internal network(10.0.0.0) on the NH.
10.0.0.0 was not shared with the public subnet and it all just worked.
tracing ip's & networks, i get...
108.90.204.1 isp GW
108.90.204.76 isp ATT rtr (WAN side)
192.168.1.254 ATT rtr access (LAN side)
10.0.0.1 NH GW (NH LAN )
10.0.0.101 (aka 108.220.213.121) WS srvr.
is this an unreasonable configuration given my goal?
it was also asked what networks i used to transition public subnet to
private subnet as, ...
192.168.1.0 to 10.0.0.0
Instead of all this random noise, can you please make a diagram of your
devices, their ports and which IP is where. Your questions and
descriptions are mostly incomprehensible. You had an almost useful
diagram a couple of days ago, but with no IP addresses.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
