On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 6:06 PM Samuel Sieb <sam...@sieb.net> wrote: > On 3/25/22 19:29, Jack Craig wrote: > > i am working to restore a web server to internet access that is failing > > after att update > > the att older modem (pace 5238ac) with arris BGW210-700. > > > > i have a static ip from att in the range 108.220.213.0/255.255.255.248 > > <http://108.220.213.0/255.255.255.248>, 108.220.213.121 is the external > > ip for the server. > > > > the bgw210-700 is the primary router/modem and is connected to a 3rd > > party router, netgear nighthawk, > > > > the internal 10.0.0.0/ <http://10.0.0.0/> connects to the netgear > nighthawk > > I'm going to try to coalesce the bits of information from various > emails, but it's still mostly blanks... > > Is the BGW210 connected via DSL or the Optical uplink port? >
no, (and i hope to have pix in the am), the bgw210770 lan port 1 of 4, connects to nighthawk internet port of the nighthawk. a nighthawk lan port is used to connect 16 port switch. all the internal hosts, including the intended web server is plugged into that switch. > > You have a static IP subnet which should be > 108.220.213.120/255.255.255.248 as explained by Richard. > yes, i accept my error in that ip/subnet map. > > Are you wanting to use multiple addresses? > att supports only 1 ip exposed ip so i didnt expect an option for more than 1. > > Do you want a computer on your network to use one of those public > addresses or are you just trying to port forward from one of those > addresses? > > There are a few ways to do those options. > an earlier suggestion was to plug the srvr into the bgw210700 as well as the nighthawk. i've been looking to update my configuration > > Where is the web server located in your network? > well, 10.0.0.101 is the internal ip for the web server. 108.220.213.121 is the external ip for that same web server. > Would you be willing to move it to a different section? > yes. clearly my approach is not happening; i trust the respondents on this thread; if y'all said stand on my head, i'd try.. ;) > > Are you using the wifi from both the BGW210 and the Nighthawk? > If so, do they have different SSIDs? > blackhole-nh is the nighthawk, blackhole-att is the bgw210700 > > Do you have the Nighthawk connected to the BGW210 using the WAN port or > a LAN port? > lan port 1. > I'm guessing it's the WAN port because you have both a 192.168.x.x > subnet (I assume that's the BGW210 LAN) and a 10.0.x.x subnet (I assume > that's the Nighthawk LAN). You would be better off connecting the > Nighthawk to the BGW210 using one of the Nighthawk's LAN ports instead, > so you only have one private subnet. But this also depends on the > answers to the questions about using the multiple public addresses. Your suggestion makes sense. i just need to get router access from this configuration. the current setup allows my firefox session to access both 10.0.0.1 & 192.168.1.254 > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure >
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
