El jue, 31-01-2013 a las 16:46 +0100, Ralf Corsepius escribió: > On 01/31/2013 04:44 AM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote: > > On 01/27/2013 06:15 PM, Lailah wrote: > >> El vie, 25-01-2013 a las 22:40 +0100, Frantisek Hanzlik escribió: > >>> Joe Zeff wrote: > >>> > On 01/25/2013 12:46 PM, James Freer wrote: > >>> >> LOL - good reply! I must admit i do get fed up with the twin names. In > >>> >> the Precise version... it was very much IMprecise. Just too many bugs > >>> >> now to be worth using. > >>> > > >>> > It often seems to me that they're too concerned about making their names > >>> > cute for my taste, but I don't use it myself and keep my opinion to > >>> > myself for the most. Now, alas, it's beginning to look like Fedora's > >>> > going down that path instead of marketing itself as a serious distro for > >>> > people who are more interested in how it works than in what it's called. > >>> > Alas, from what I can see, unless I'm active as a Fedora dev (My > >>> > programming skills rusted away decades ago.) the only input I have to > >>> > the > >>> > process is making suggestions. None of us "mere users" have a vote. > >>> > > > > I'd guess, it's people being dissatisfied with what they are used to, > now being on a "quest for the better". > > That said, from what I've heard and read, Ubuntu is in a similar > crisis as Fedora. What is Gnome3 in Fedora seems to be Unity in Ubuntu > (users turning away), what's the anaconda-disaster in F18 seems to be a > general stability in Ubuntu 12.10.
Of what stability are you talking about? In Ubuntu I couldn't find it. And Unity is worse than Gnome 3. Just my experience Lailah
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
