Sylvain Hellegouarch wrote: > Fredrik Lundh wrote: >> Sylvain Hellegouarch wrote: >> >>> Is this the correct behavior? >> yes. a Python implementation is not required to have a distinct Unicode >> string type; see: >> >> http://jython.sourceforge.net/docs/differences.html >> >> </F> > > OK. Thanks for the heads up. > Mind you I find that a bit confusing and I'd rather have the type to > display unicode rather than str in that case. But fair enough. >
Interestingly after reading Peter Bengtsson's last post [1] i tried the following: CPython >>> 't' is u't' False >>> u't' is 't' False IronPython >>> 't' is u't' True >>> u't' is 't' True I can understand why IP or JYthon uses the same type but then the results don't seem to be consistent with CPython. I might misunderstand something here. Alternatively I assume using 'is' implies such issues. - Sylvain [1] http://www.peterbe.com/plog/is-equal-in-python _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
