Sylvain Hellegouarch wrote: > I can understand why IP or JYthon uses the same type but then the > results don't seem to be consistent with CPython. I might misunderstand > something here. Alternatively I assume using 'is' implies such issues.
you're confusing CPython implementation details with the language specification. Python makes very few guarantees about object identities; the specification says that there must be exactly one None object, and the type object for two objects of the same type is the same object (obviously), but that's about it. </F> _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
