Given that the IronPython str always supports Unicode, if you got your wish I don't think you'd ever see "str" again. Either that, or there would have to be two types when that's not needed for any extra functionality.
At 12:23 PM 12/1/2006, Sylvain Hellegouarch wrote >Fredrik Lundh wrote: >> Sylvain Hellegouarch wrote: >> >>> Is this the correct behavior? >> >> yes. a Python implementation is not required to have a distinct Unicode >> string type; see: >> >> http://jython.sourceforge.net/docs/differences.html >> >> </F> > >OK. Thanks for the heads up. >Mind you I find that a bit confusing and I'd rather have the type to >display unicode rather than str in that case. But fair enough. > >- Sylvain J. Merrill / Analytical Software Corp _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
