Curt Hagenlocher wrote: > Here's an implementation idea that may require less work at the > expense of less-elegant syntax. > > class X(object, clr.AttributeBase(System.SerializableAttribute)) > pass > > NewTypeMaker would look for base classes of whatever built-in type is > returned by clr.AttributeBase and would use that information to > decorate the generated type. >
That wouldn't play well with metaclasses, which isn't a showstopper. It is rather ugly. :-) Would this technique have anything to offer for attributes on methods and properties (etc). Michael > -- > Curt Hagenlocher > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.ironpython.com > http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
