On Feb 4, 2008 2:27 PM, Dino Viehland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As other people have pointed out decorators are a runtime concept and I > don't think we get to change that. So consider a class decorator
You could theoretically have a "slightly alternate" parsing mode that recognizes a specific class decorator name before the class definition is closed (and therefore before codegen). In other words, the following definition > @ClrAttribute(System.SerializableAttribute) > class X(ISomething, object): treats the decorator differently if it matches one of the special-case names. The change in parsing could be triggered by something like "from future import clr_hacks". On Feb 4, 2008 2:32 PM, Keith J. Farmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > CPythonista outrage over not being able to read something they could > never run is rather silly. :) You're clearly having trouble envisioning the following Slashdot headline: "Microsoft inflicts 'embrace and extend' on Python". Silly or not, perceptions are hugely important. -- Curt Hagenlocher [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com