On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 12:37:54PM -0600, Ralph Castain wrote: > No....afraid not. Things work pretty well, but there are places > where things just don't mesh. Sub-node allocation in particular is > an issue as it implies binding, and slurm and ompi have conflicting > methods. > > It all can get worked out, but we have limited time and nobody cares > enough to put in the effort. Slurm just isn't used enough to make it > worthwhile (too small an audience).
I am about to get my first HPC cluster (128 nodes), and was considering slurm. We do use MPI. Should I be looking at Torque instead for a queue manager? Suggestions appreciated, Douglas. -- Douglas Guptill voice: 902-461-9749 Research Assistant, LSC 4640 email: douglas.gupt...@dal.ca Oceanography Department fax: 902-494-3877 Dalhousie University Halifax, NS, B3H 4J1, Canada
