The trunk (development code) was switched from 1.12.x to 2.1.x and you can get the URL from http://www.opensips.org/Downloads/Downloads#toc4.

The trunk version is not for production. See the available versions here:
http://www.opensips.org/About/AvailableVersions

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com

On 26.09.2014 16:48, Satish Patel wrote:
Where is the trunk git URL to download latest 1.12.x? does it ready for production?

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Ovidiu Sas <o...@voipembedded.com <mailto:o...@voipembedded.com>> wrote:

    Are we ready to deprecate the mi_xmlrpc module now (for 1.12)?

    -ovidiu

    On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
    <bog...@opensips.org <mailto:bog...@opensips.org>> wrote:
    > Hello all,
    >
    > Bringing some light here : none of the xmlrpc implementations
    offer a
    > structured reply
    >
    > From the "deprecation" point of view, we need to be sure:
    > 1) the new mi_xmlrpc-ng module is a perfect substitute to the
    old one
    > (providing the same unstructured reply)
    > 2) the new mi_xmlrpc-ng module can also provide a structured
    reply - this
    > definitely is something good for the future
    > 3) OpenSIPS CP must be migrated (there are some things that need
    to be
    > changed) to be compatible with both modules.
    >
    > Ovidiu (mi_xmlepc-ng) and Alex (opensips cp) are already heavily
    working to
    > achieve the 3 goals above (many thanks to both of them).
    >
    > As noticed, the old mi_xmlrpc module was not deprecated in 1.11
    - there are
    > small but many things to be done to 100% ensure a smooth
    transition. Still
    > this is work on progress and it will be done for next release.
    >
    > Many thanks,
    >
    > Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
    > OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
    > http://www.opensips-solutions.com
    >
    > On 19.03.2014 21:55, Brett Nemeroff wrote:
    >
    > JSON+http sounds fantastic. It's like.. Starting to sound a like
    a RESTful
    > server.
    >
    > I'm pretty sure others will jump on this. I know I would.
    > -Brett
    >
    >
    >
    > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Ovidiu Sas
    <o...@voipembedded.com <mailto:o...@voipembedded.com>> wrote:
    >>
    >> The new module is built on top of the httpd module which has a
    >> parameter to define the size of the buffer.  If you need large
    >> replies, then you need to adjust the buffer size accordingly.
    >> http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/devel/httpd
    >>
    >> That buffer is used by all modules that are sitting on top of the
    >> httpd module, and there's one single process dedicated to all http
    >> requests (no interference with SIP workers).
    >>
    >> Regards,
    >> Ovidiu Sas
    >>
    >> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Brett Nemeroff
    <br...@nemeroff.com <mailto:br...@nemeroff.com>>
    >> wrote:
    >> > I think there are some other issues with the size of the
    return data. I
    >> > know
    >> > for one that the mi_udp method has a buffer size limit. If
    you hit this
    >> > limit I think it very quietly truncates the data. I can't
    100% verify
    >> > that
    >> > since it's been a long time since I've used it.
    >> >
    >> > I believe you can paginate the data, but the problem is that
    you can't
    >> > guarantee consistent results paginating data when the data is
    changing
    >> > constantly. I'm not really sure on the background how this is
    handled;
    >> > maybe
    >> > a locked list or something.. but not sure if it'd affect
    performance at
    >> > high
    >> > velocity. Seems like something. somewhere would be affected..
    either
    >> > performance or accuracy.
    >> >
    >> > My point being, care needs to be taken that the method can
    produce
    >> > consistent results; even for large datasets. If data is going
    to be
    >> > truncated or we run out of SHM, there needs to not only be an
    error log,
    >> > but
    >> > I think the out put needs to say something as well.
    >> >
    >> > -Brett
    >> >
    >> >
    >> >
    >> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Dragomir Haralambiev
    >> > <goup2...@gmail.com <mailto:goup2...@gmail.com>>
    >> > wrote:
    >> >>
    >> >> I totally share Brett's feelings! For me dlg_list_ctx over
    the new
    >> >> module
    >> >> causes lots of headaches when dialogs go over 100 or so.
    Structured
    >> >> output
    >> >> would resolve such problems. I am totally in for structured
    SJON format
    >> >> too!
    >> >>
    >> >>
    >> >> 2014-03-19 21:07 GMT+02:00 Brett Nemeroff
    <br...@nemeroff.com <mailto:br...@nemeroff.com>>:
    >> >>
    >> >>> I think the only reason for that is backwards compatibility
    with stuff
    >> >>> written for the other mi interfaces.
    >> >>>
    >> >>>
    >> >>> Honestly, my parsers for the MI output are ridiculous. It's
    really
    >> >>> complicated and prone to failure. I'd like to know if
    others share my
    >> >>> feeling here.
    >> >>>
    >> >>> For little things like "dr_reload" I don't really care.
    >> >>>
    >> >>> But for MI calls that return large amounts of user data, like
    >> >>> dlg_list_ctx.. Parsing it is kind of ridiculous... Anyone
    else share
    >> >>> this
    >> >>> feeling?
    >> >>>
    >> >>> I personally would love to see it structured in JSON format. :)
    >> >>>
    >> >>> -Brett
    >> >>>
    >> >>>
    >> >>>
    >> >>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Ovidiu Sas
    <o...@voipembedded.com <mailto:o...@voipembedded.com>>
    >> >>> wrote:
    >> >>>>
    >> >>>> Hello Brett,
    >> >>>>
    >> >>>> It is true that the structured output mode was not
    implemented in the
    >> >>>> new module.
    >> >>>> It seems that having the output in one big chunk is the
    preferred
    >> >>>> method in the community.
    >> >>>>
    >> >>>> If there is a real demand for structured output, we can
    take a look
    >> >>>> into
    >> >>>> it.
    >> >>>>
    >> >>>> Regards,
    >> >>>> Ovidiu Sas
    >> >>>>
    >> >>>>
    >> >>>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Brett Nemeroff
    <br...@nemeroff.com <mailto:br...@nemeroff.com>>
    >> >>>> wrote:
    >> >>>> > I'd like to see the new module to be a drop in
    replacement for the
    >> >>>> > old
    >> >>>> > one..
    >> >>>> >
    >> >>>> > That being said...
    >> >>>> >
    >> >>>> > I was pretty surprised when I started down the path of
    the XMLRPC
    >> >>>> > module
    >> >>>> > that the reply isn't structured. It was just one big object.
    >> >>>> >
    >> >>>> > I'd like a selectable option on the module so that it either
    >> >>>> > operates:
    >> >>>> > 1. Legacy (one big output chunk)
    >> >>>> > 2. Structured, parable for each output node.
    >> >>>> >
    >> >>>> > Really if we are talking "deprecating" we need to
    support the old
    >> >>>> > method
    >> >>>> > primarily or there will be a lot of broken code out there.
    >> >>>> >
    >> >>>> > -Brett
    >> >>>> >
    >> >>>> >
    >> >>>> >
    >> >>>> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
    >> >>>> > <bog...@opensips.org <mailto:bog...@opensips.org>>
    >> >>>> > wrote:
    >> >>>> >>
    >> >>>> >> The whole idea is not to :)
    >> >>>> >>
    >> >>>> >> But more tests need to be done.
    >> >>>> >>
    >> >>>> >> Regards,
    >> >>>> >>
    >> >>>> >> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
    >> >>>> >> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
    >> >>>> >> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
    >> >>>> >>
    >> >>>> >> On 19.03.2014 17:39, Ali Pey wrote:
    >> >>>> >>
    >> >>>> >> Will this affect OpenSIPS-CP?
    >> >>>> >>
    >> >>>> >> Regards,
    >> >>>> >> Ali Pey
    >> >>>> >>
    >> >>>> >>
    >> >>>> >>
    >> >>>> >> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Kneeoh
    <kne...@yahoo.com <mailto:kne...@yahoo.com>> wrote:
    >> >>>> >>>
    >> >>>> >>> I'm all for the deprecation as long as the
    documentation on the
    >> >>>> >>> mi_xmlrpc_ng module is updated to a usable level. I
    find myself
    >> >>>> >>> referencing
    >> >>>> >>> the documentation for xmlrpc and hoping that it holds
    true for
    >> >>>> >>> xmlrpc_ng.
    >> >>>> >>>
    >> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________
    >> >>>> >>> Users mailing list
    >> >>>> >>> Users@lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org>
    >> >>>> >>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
    >> >>>> >>
    >> >>>> >>
    >> >>>> >>
    >> >>>> >>
    >> >>>> >> _______________________________________________
    >> >>>> >> Users mailing list
    >> >>>> >> Users@lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org>
    >> >>>> >> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
    >> >>>> >>
    >> >>>> >>
    >> >>>> >>
    >> >>>> >> _______________________________________________
    >> >>>> >> Users mailing list
    >> >>>> >> Users@lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org>
    >> >>>> >> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
    >> >>>> >>
    >> >>>> >
    >> >>>> >
    >> >>>> > _______________________________________________
    >> >>>> > Users mailing list
    >> >>>> > Users@lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org>
    >> >>>> > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
    >> >>>> >
    >> >>>>
    >> >>>>
    >> >>>>
    >> >>>> --
    >> >>>> VoIP Embedded, Inc.
    >> >>>> http://www.voipembedded.com
    >> >>>>
    >> >>>> _______________________________________________
    >> >>>> Users mailing list
    >> >>>> Users@lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org>
    >> >>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
    >> >>>
    >> >>>
    >> >>>
    >> >>> _______________________________________________
    >> >>> Users mailing list
    >> >>> Users@lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org>
    >> >>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
    >> >>>
    >> >>
    >> >>
    >> >> _______________________________________________
    >> >> Users mailing list
    >> >> Users@lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org>
    >> >> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
    >> >>
    >> >
    >> >
    >> > _______________________________________________
    >> > Users mailing list
    >> > Users@lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org>
    >> > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
    >> >
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> --
    >> VoIP Embedded, Inc.
    >> http://www.voipembedded.com
    >>
    >> _______________________________________________
    >> Users mailing list
    >> Users@lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org>
    >> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Users mailing list
    > Users@lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org>
    > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
    >
    >
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Users mailing list
    > Users@lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org>
    > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
    >



    --
    VoIP Embedded, Inc.
    http://www.voipembedded.com

    _______________________________________________
    Users mailing list
    Users@lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org>
    http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users




_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to