ICE in general uses STUN (RFC 5245), however I do not use Mediaproxy myself so cannot comment on how it handles STUN. Someone with Mediaproxy may be able to answer. On 19 Oct 2015 14:41, "Rodrigo Pimenta Carvalho" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ok Nabeel. > > > In my environment, I intend to have MediaProxy and all clients supporting > ICE. > > However, in my environment/network doesn't exist a STUN server. > > > So, my last questions (before I start the MediaProxy installation > procedures) about this subject are: > > > 1 - Does MediaProxy work as a STUN server, or just as a TURN server? > > > 2 - Is it always necessary to provide a STUN server separately, even using > the MediaProxy, if direct media is desired? > > > 3 - Let's suppose I will not provide a separately STUN server, in this > case will the media always pass through the media relay,? > > > Thank you again! > > Best regards. > > > > RODRIGO PIMENTA CARVALHO > Inatel Competence Center > Software > Ph: +55 35 3471 9200 RAMAL 979 > > > ------------------------------ > *De:* [email protected] <[email protected]> > em nome de Nabeel <[email protected]> > *Enviado:* segunda-feira, 19 de outubro de 2015 10:40 > *Para:* OpenSIPS users mailling list > *Assunto:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Does Media_Relay component implies in > impossible direct media? > > Yes, that is how it should work. ICE tries to connect directly first > before trying other methods. If direct connection fails, then it tries > STUN, then media relay. The clients have to support ICE too. > > On 19 October 2015 at 11:35, Rodrigo Pimenta Carvalho <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Nabeel. >> >> >> Thank you very much for your answer. >> >> If I understood it well, while using MediaProxy, the clients may connect >> directly, but they may not too. ICE will decide it for me and I don't need >> to worry about it. >> >> Tell me if I got it, please. >> >> >> Best regards. >> >> >> >> >> RODRIGO PIMENTA CARVALHO >> Inatel Competence Center >> Software >> Ph: +55 35 3471 9200 RAMAL 979 >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *De:* [email protected] <[email protected]> >> em nome de Nabeel <[email protected]> >> *Enviado:* sábado, 17 de outubro de 2015 19:56 >> *Para:* OpenSIPS users mailling list >> *Assunto:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Does Media_Relay component implies in >> impossible direct media? >> >> >> Rodrigo, >> >> It is the responsibility of ICE to determine in which situation it is >> best to establish a direct connection, versus use of STUN, versus use of a >> media relay. >> >> We cannot manually decide which clients will connect directly and which >> will not. >> On 17 Oct 2015 22:07, "Rodrigo Pimenta Carvalho" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi. >>> >>> >>> In my project, UACs should run direct media. RTP packets direct >>> transmitted from each other. >>> >>> However, due to NAT presence, I'm thinking about to use MediaProxy. >>> >>> >>> In this case, is it possible to get direct media after some UAC >>> negotiations passing through the Media_Relay component, or is it >>> impossible? That is, does the media will always pass through the >>> Media_Relay host too? >>> >>> >>> Any hint will be very helpful! >>> >>> Thanks alot. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> RODRIGO PIMENTA CARVALHO >>> Inatel Competence Center >>> Software >>> Ph: +55 35 3471 9200 RAMAL 979 >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
