Read again what I wrote: If you don’t use STUN and when using ICE, media will go directly between end-points behind the same NAT. The rest of the calls will go through media relay.
> On 20 Oct 2015, at 07:48, Rodrigo Pimenta Carvalho <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ok Adrian. > > Thank you too! > > But I am still trying to find the answer for the following question, before > deciding to install MediaProxy: > > Can MediaProxy, by itself, without a separated STUN server, provide all > necessary functionalities to my system get direct media between UACs? > > > > Best regards. > > > RODRIGO PIMENTA CARVALHO > Inatel Competence Center > Software > Ph: +55 35 3471 9200 RAMAL 979 > > > De: [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> em nome de Adrian Georgescu > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Enviado: segunda-feira, 19 de outubro de 2015 18:54 > Para: OpenSIPS users mailling list > Assunto: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Does Media_Relay component implies in > impossible direct media? > > If you don’t use STUN and when using ICE, media will go directly between > end-points behind the same NAT. The rest of the calls will go through media > relay. > > Adrian > >> On 19 Oct 2015, at 11:03, Nabeel <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> ICE in general uses STUN (RFC 5245), however I do not use Mediaproxy myself >> so cannot comment on how it handles STUN. Someone with Mediaproxy may be >> able to answer. >> On 19 Oct 2015 14:41, "Rodrigo Pimenta Carvalho" <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> Ok Nabeel. >> >> In my environment, I intend to have MediaProxy and all clients supporting >> ICE. >> However, in my environment/network doesn't exist a STUN server. >> >> So, my last questions (before I start the MediaProxy installation >> procedures) about this subject are: >> >> 1 - Does MediaProxy work as a STUN server, or just as a TURN server? >> >> 2 - Is it always necessary to provide a STUN server separately, even using >> the MediaProxy, if direct media is desired? >> >> 3 - Let's suppose I will not provide a separately STUN server, in this case >> will the media always pass through the media relay,? >> >> Thank you again! >> Best regards. >> >> >> RODRIGO PIMENTA CARVALHO >> Inatel Competence Center >> Software >> Ph: +55 35 3471 9200 <tel:%2B55%2035%203471%209200> RAMAL 979 >> >> >> De: [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> em nome de Nabeel >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> Enviado: segunda-feira, 19 de outubro de 2015 10:40 >> Para: OpenSIPS users mailling list >> Assunto: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Does Media_Relay component implies in >> impossible direct media? >> >> Yes, that is how it should work. ICE tries to connect directly first before >> trying other methods. If direct connection fails, then it tries STUN, then >> media relay. The clients have to support ICE too. >> >> On 19 October 2015 at 11:35, Rodrigo Pimenta Carvalho <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> Hi Nabeel. >> >> Thank you very much for your answer. >> If I understood it well, while using MediaProxy, the clients may connect >> directly, but they may not too. ICE will decide it for me and I don't need >> to worry about it. >> Tell me if I got it, please. >> >> Best regards. >> >> >> >> RODRIGO PIMENTA CARVALHO >> Inatel Competence Center >> Software >> Ph: +55 35 3471 9200 <tel:%2B55%2035%203471%209200> RAMAL 979 >> >> >> De: [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> em nome de Nabeel >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> Enviado: sábado, 17 de outubro de 2015 19:56 >> Para: OpenSIPS users mailling list >> Assunto: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Does Media_Relay component implies in >> impossible direct media? >> >> Rodrigo, >> It is the responsibility of ICE to determine in which situation it is best >> to establish a direct connection, versus use of STUN, versus use of a media >> relay. >> We cannot manually decide which clients will connect directly and which will >> not. >> On 17 Oct 2015 22:07, "Rodrigo Pimenta Carvalho" <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hi. >> >> In my project, UACs should run direct media. RTP packets direct transmitted >> from each other. >> However, due to NAT presence, I'm thinking about to use MediaProxy. >> >> In this case, is it possible to get direct media after some UAC negotiations >> passing through the Media_Relay component, or is it impossible? That is, >> does the media will always pass through the Media_Relay host too? >> >> Any hint will be very helpful! >> Thanks alot. >> >> >> >> >> RODRIGO PIMENTA CARVALHO >> Inatel Competence Center >> Software >> Ph: +55 35 3471 9200 <tel:%2B55%2035%203471%209200> RAMAL 979 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> <http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> <http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> <http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
