So who wants to change the repository plugin to enforce the pom being present.....
It's really low on my list of priorities for a 1.0 release....... -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ "Michal Maczka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/09/2003 09:33:56 PM: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:16 AM > > To: Maven Users List > > Subject: Re: Distinguishing between runtime and compile time > dependencies > > > > > > > > On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/09/2003 > 01:24:22 > > AM: > > > > > > > Is there any reason to not start trying to accumulate POMs in the > > > > repositories? > > > We are trying....many hands needed.... > > > > dion: I think we can easily do much better. > > E.g. commons-lang 2 was recently added to ibiblio > but folder http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/commons-lang/poms/ > is still empty. We have much more POMs then we publish! > > We should simply not add any new jar to ibiblio without its POM. > > > How can I help? Just put together a structure with all the poms in? > > > > How will the filenames handle multiple versions? > > > > project-1.0.xml? > > 1.0/project.xml? > > > > poms/foo-1.0.pom > > > Michal > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
