Although you can create a new git repo, add a remote, and then pull a single 
branch. Not the same as checking out a directory from svn, but you don't *have* 
to get the entire repo.

I use this in my wagon-gitsite app to push docs to the gh-pages branch of 
github projects.

-K

On Apr 26, 2010, at 3:18 PM, Justin Edelson wrote:

> Jean-Laurent de Morlhon wrote:
>> You say the git way of doing things is 1 project -> 1 git repository, I 
>> understand, and it's not very far of having a svn repo for every project in 
>> svn altough the release plugin do not enforce this.
> Subversion doesn't enforce this. In fact, Subversion is designed to support a 
> 1 to many relationship between projects and repositories whereas Git is 
> designed for a 1 to 1 relationship. This has nothing to do with Maven.
>> 
>> The current state of the release plugin force you to have the pom.xml at the 
>> root of your  git repository or to say it differently if you have a pom.xml 
>> anywhere else than the root directory you can't release the project. (of 
>> course submodule of root located pom.xml do not count)...
>> 
>> It's also common practice in the maven world to have a parent pom to share 
>> common settings. If I follow blindlessly the 1 project -> 1 git repository, 
>> it means I have to setup a git repository for a single parent pom ?
> A multi-module project should be in a single git repository. An 
> organizational pom should be in its own repository which may, you are 
> correct, result in a repository with a single file in it.
>> I have the feeling, but I maybe wrong, that this is more a limitation of the 
>> release plugin / scm provider more than a design goal.
> No. It's a design goal. See 
> https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/GitSvnComparison#Partial_Checkout.2FUsed_bandwidth
> 
> Justin
> 
>> 
>> Those who migrated to git, what do you do for the above cases, especially 
>> the parent pom one ?
>> 
>> Jean-Laurent
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Justin Edelson <justinedel...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:justinedel...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>>    OK. Then we're on the same page...
>> 
>>    On 4/26/10 11:32 AM, Kathryn Huxtable wrote:
>>    > Perhaps I wasn't clear. I don't support multiple projects in one
>>    repository. Definitely not. I was trying to criticize the
>>    svn-centric thinking, not support it.
>>    >
>>    > I think there should be a JIRA issue to make modules work, given
>>    that they'll be in separate repositories.
>>    >
>>    > I'm not going to file this because I have almost zero experience
>>    with nested projects. There have been places it would have made
>>    sense and I shied away.
>>    >
>>    > But the release plugin should work with git projects that have
>>    modules and it should do it in the standard git manner, which is
>>    one repository containing one project. (Distributed, of course.)
>>    >
>>    > -K
>>    >
>>    > On Apr 26, 2010, at 9:06 AM, Justin Edelson wrote:
>>    >
>>    >> Kathryn-
>>    >> Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you mean, but I think you have this
>>    >> exactly backwards. The "svn-centric thinking" is what's
>>    inspired someone
>>    >> to put multiple projects in the same repository. AFAIK, this is
>>    simply
>>    >> not supported by git, i.e. there's no way to clone, branch or
>>    tag _part_
>>    >> of a repository.
>>    >>
>>    >> I am by no means a git expert, so I could be mistaken about this.
>>    >>
>>    >> Justin
>>    >>
>>    >>
>>    >>
>>    >> On 4/26/10 9:21 AM, Kathryn Huxtable wrote:
>>    >>> Having recently switched from svn to git for most of my
>>    projects, I have an opinion.
>>    >>>
>>    >>> I think you should create a JIRA ticket and consider this a bug.
>>    >>>
>>    >>> What we're dealing with here is a bit of svn-centric thinking
>>    during design. It needs to be fixed.
>>    >>>
>>    >>> -K
>>    >>>
>>    >>> On Apr 26, 2010, at 8:08 AM, Jean-Laurent de Morlhon wrote:
>>    >>>
>>    >>>> We're considering migrating from svn to git, we stumble on the
>>    >>>> maven-release-plugin usage with git.
>>    >>>> We think we prefer to use a single repository for many
>>    independently built
>>    >>>> projects like :
>>    >>>>
>>    >>>> foobar-repo.git
>>    >>>>  |-> project-foo/
>>    >>>>  |    |-> pom.xml
>>    >>>>  |    |–> module A/
>>    >>>>  |    |-> module B/
>>    >>>>  |
>>    >>>>  |-> project-bar/
>>    >>>>       |-> pom.xml
>>    >>>>
>>    >>>>
>>    >>>> project-bar scm url looks like :
>>    >>>> <connection>scm:git:ssh://somehost.nowhere:/foobar-repo.git
>>    </connection>
>>    >>>>
>>    >>>> This hints to the right repository but I can't write that the
>>    actual
>>    >>>> project-bar is in the project-bar subdirectory.
>>    >>>>
>>    >>>> mvn release:prepare goes well and ends succesfully.
>>    >>>>
>>    >>>> mvn release:perform fails whenever it tries to build the
>>    project from the
>>    >>>> tag. It effectively clone correctly the repository.
>>    >>>> But use the root of the repository rather than going into
>>    project-bar
>>    >>>> subdirectory whenever it tries to clean deploy the tag.
>>    >>>>
>>    >>>> This prevent using git and multiple projects in the same
>>    directory.
>>    >>>> Some may think we should use gitmodules but
>>    >>>> 1) the release plugin does not support it [1]
>>    >>>> 2) gitmodules is an aggregate of single repository
>>    >>>>
>>    >>>> Should I issue a "new feature" ticket into jira project
>>    MRELEASE or SCM ?
>>    >>>> Or should I fall back to the current convention of 1 project
>>    = 1 git
>>    >>>> repository ??
>>    >>>> Or maybe someone managed to do it ?
>>    >>>>
>>    >>>> any advice appreciated.
>>    >>>>
>>    >>>> [1] : http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-530
>>    >>>
>>    >>>
>>    >>>
>>    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>    >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>>    <mailto:users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org>
>>    >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
>>    <mailto:users-h...@maven.apache.org>
>>    >>>
>>    >>
>>    >>
>>    >>
>>    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>    >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>>    <mailto:users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org>
>>    >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
>>    <mailto:users-h...@maven.apache.org>
>>    >
>>    >
>>    >
>>    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>    > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>>    <mailto:users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org>
>>    > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
>>    <mailto:users-h...@maven.apache.org>
>>    >
>> 
>> 
>>    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>    To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>>    <mailto:users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org>
>>    For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
>>    <mailto:users-h...@maven.apache.org>
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to