Hi Anders, Anders Hammar wrote:
> Thanks! > > Jörg's approach is what I was thinking of. The only drawback is > bad/incorrect metadata (pom packaging). That could be fixed though. > The nice thing is that this would also work great with a ws registry > containing wsdl files, which could quite easily be proxied by a repo > manager as a maven repo. > > Any drawback not packing it as a jar that someone could think of? Why do you need a jar? With packaging pom you will have a pom and a wsdl in repository afterwards. The packaging is more of interest for automated classpath processing. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
