Hi Anders, Anders Hammar wrote:
> I don't necessarily want a jar. I'm just wondering if anyone have run into > issues using either one of the approaches. I'm thinking about classpaths, > plugins etc. > > The packaging type is metadata and should be correct. For the this project > the wsdl file is the primary artifact, but if the packing says 'pom' we're > saying that the pom is the artifact. It's not a major issue, but could > cause some problems for tools using the metadata (like a repo manager). > > How do you handle your schemas. Do the artifact's version follow the > version of the schema? Yes. The nice thing is that after rel,ease it is possible to access it directly from a Maven repo. If we need the file for further processing (e.g. XMLBeans) we simply add it to the deps and use the dependencies plugin to pull it off the repo: <plugin> <artifactId>maven-dependency-plugin</artifactId> <executions> <execution> <id>schema</id> <phase>initialize</phase> <goals> <goal>copy-dependencies</goal> </goals> <configuration> <outputDirectory>target/xsd</outputDirectory> <overWriteReleases>false</overWriteReleases> <overWriteSnapshots>true</overWriteSnapshots> <includeTypes>xsd</includeTypes> <includeScope>provided</includeScope> </configuration> </execution> </executions> </plugin> However, as Danial said, this is fine for self-containing files and can be difficult if is is XML and contains includes. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org