Le mercredi 3 décembre 2014 17:32:47 Rodrigo Cano a écrit : > I just want to say that maven is not at all flowers, their phase model is > too primitive, to the point where something such as wsimport (pretty basic > stuff for good ol' java) did not work properly: I had a configuration for > the java version wanted in the pom.xml, but because of the way phases work > and the very restricted compile order, wsimport would always pick my > OS-globally configured wsimport instead of the one configured in the > pom.xml, leading to incorrect defintions of the ws and a VERY ugly hack > where I had to basically compile the thing twice to get it right. Also, my > os installed java was java7, the pom.xml stated that I wanted java6, guess > what version would the .class generated by wsimport be.. I'm interested to understand the problem and try to improve. What is the Maven plugin you're using for wsimport, with which version?
The general solution to such problem is to use Toolchains: toolchains support has to be implemented in the plugin. Here is a list of know plugins supporting toolchains: http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-using-toolchains.html Adding jax-ws plugin to the list would be an interesting improvement > > My point is, build tools are no easy task, and I know no system that does > it right. While my experience with sbt has certainly not been yours (and > I've done quite a bit with it, same with maven, where I had written several > plugins for our own dev environment), I do have to say that I find it an > improvement over maven. > > I still love maven for what it accomplished though. +1 peace: just let everyone choose the best tool for his own use case And let us know when Maven can be improved. Regards, Hervé > > Cheers. > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Eric Kolotyluk <eric.koloty...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > Does anyone know of a good emotional support group for people trying to > > > > use Maven with Typesafe projects such as Akka and Play? > > > > I was thinking maybe there could a buddy/sponsor system, such as used in > > AA and other self help groups. Maybe there might be group sessions where > > people can talk about their trauma, especially by being constantly > > invalidated by comments such as "you should use the simple build tool SBT, > > cause, well you know, it's simple and easy to use." > > > > Seriously though, is there a community of people who are successfully > > using Maven with Akka an Play projects? I would love to meet you. > > > > I can see why people who have tried Maven naturally think "oh, its' too > > complicated, anyone can write a simple build tool that does what Maven > > does." Clearly they do not appreciate what Maven is or what it does. SBT > > and Gradle are two great examples of projects that attempted to do > > something more simple, but in the end, really don't measure up. > > > > I personally think the Scala community would be been better served if more > > investment was made in developing better Scala build tools within the > > Maven > > framework. More and better plugins for Scala, Akka, Play, etc. Better use > > of > > > > http://books.sonatype.com/mcookbook/reference/sect-scala-script-inline.htm > > l > > http://books.sonatype.com/mcookbook/reference/ch03s03.html > > > > I don't know if there is a Scala template for writing Maven plugins (or > > mojos), but there should be. > > > > The more I use SBT, the less I like it. It is not what I consider a > > serious build tool for build engineers, it is a toy or playground for > > Scala > > hackers who thrive on the abstruse. Don't get me wrong, I love Scala, but > > creating a build tool around .scala files just invites the use of chicken > > tracks and obscure overly concise cleverness that leads to one WTF > > experience after another. *It is actually possible to write Scala code > > that you can reason about,* but it just as easy to write Scala code that > > resembles APL, and reasoning about build engineering was clearly not a > > priority with the designers of SBT. > > > > The Scala-IDE was a really great approach because it leveraged off of an > > existing IDE infrastructure such as Eclipse, rather than trying to write > > an > > IDE from scratch the way SBT does. I wish the Scala/Typesafe community had > > taken the same approach with build-tools. > > > > - Eric > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "scala-debate" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to scala-debate+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
