Ouch, I was afraid someone would say something like that.

Is there some alternative to Play, such that we can migrate existing Play projects to something that is Maven friendly?

Cheers, Eric

On 2014-12-04 5:31 AM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
Play *very* firmly wants you to use the activator framework to control your
build and deploy - I'd seriously not try and fight against it.  It's one of
the reasons we dropped the Play framework for a community project we're
working on, that and the constant breaking of APIs etc :-).

Cheers,
Martijn

On 4 December 2014 at 12:58, Jeff Jensen <[email protected]>
wrote:

If you want to publish to Maven Central I recommend
https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/
getting-started-apache-maven-video

In case it helps, I've helped a few deploy to Central and recommend this
(and the other pages on the "Producers" menu); makes it very easy:
http://central.sonatype.org/pages/ossrh-guide.html


On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Eric Kolotyluk <[email protected]>
wrote:

Ha ha ha. Very good :-)

I have published to Maven Central, so I know how daunting this can be at
first.

If you want to publish to Maven Central I recommend
https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/
getting-started-apache-maven-video

Cheers, Eric

On 12/3/2014 11:27 AM, Jon Pretty wrote:

I can offer you this:

http://play.textadventures.co.uk/Play.aspx?id=zv-wer8keey6rnhk4am25q

It's a create-your-own-adventure about my experience of trying to
publish
a library to Maven Central. It's a couple of years old now, so the
landscape might have improved a little in patches.

Jon


On 3 December 2014 at 19:11, Eric Kolotyluk <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

     Does anyone know of a good emotional support group for people
     trying to use Maven with Typesafe projects such as Akka and Play?

     I was thinking maybe there could a buddy/sponsor system, such as
     used in AA and other self help groups. Maybe there might be group
     sessions where people can talk about their trauma, especially by
     being constantly invalidated by comments such as "you should use
     the simple build tool SBT, cause, well you know, it's simple and
     easy to use."

     Seriously though, is there a community of people who are
     successfully using Maven with Akka an Play projects? I would love
     to meet you.

     I can see why people who have tried Maven naturally think "oh,
     its' too complicated, anyone can write a simple build tool that
     does what Maven does." Clearly they do not appreciate what Maven
     is or what it does. SBT and Gradle are two great examples of
     projects that attempted to do something more simple, but in the
     end, really don't measure up.

     I personally think the Scala community would be been better served
     if more investment was made in developing better Scala build tools
     within the Maven framework. More and better plugins for Scala,
     Akka, Play, etc.  Better use of

     http://books.sonatype.com/mcookbook/reference/sect-
scala-script-inline.html
     http://books.sonatype.com/mcookbook/reference/ch03s03.html

     I don't know if there is a Scala template for writing Maven
     plugins (or mojos), but there should be.

     The more I use SBT, the less I like it. It is not what I consider
     a serious build tool for build engineers, it is a toy or
     playground for Scala hackers who thrive on the abstruse. Don't get
     me wrong, I love Scala, but creating a build tool around .scala
     files just invites the use of chicken tracks and obscure overly
     concise cleverness that leads to one WTF experience after another.
     /It is actually possible to write Scala code that you can reason
     about,/ but it just as easy to write Scala code that resembles
     APL, and reasoning about build engineering was clearly not a
     priority with the designers of SBT.

     The Scala-IDE was a really great approach because it leveraged off
     of an existing IDE infrastructure such as Eclipse, rather than
     trying to write an IDE from scratch the way SBT does. I wish the
     Scala/Typesafe community had taken the same approach with
build-tools.
     - Eric
     --     You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google
     Groups "scala-debate" group.
     To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
     send an email to [email protected]
     <mailto:[email protected]>.
     For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




--
Jon Pretty | @propensive




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to