There must be a way to set this up in the main pom file versus in
everyone's individual settings.xml file, right? 

-----Original Message-----
From: Wayne Fay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 2:32 PM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: Internal (intranet) repositories

I think there's a basic misunderstanding here... As far as I know it,
Maven *always* checks Central first. Even if you define another repo
somewhere else.

One way people prevent this is by setting up Maven proxy and then
setting that proxy as a mirror of Central in their settings.xml file.
Then instead of Central, it checks your proxy for the files, and if
your proxy doesn't have it, it goes out to Central on its own and
retrieves them, and then provides them to your Maven process.

Wayne

On 4/7/06, EJ Ciramella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, something else is wrong then, I have apache running on another
> machine and I have this:
>
>        <repositories>
>                <repository>
>                        <id>lty-local</id>
>                        <name>local-repository</name>
>
> <url>http://build.corp.upromise.com/mavenrepository/</url>
>                </repository>
>        </repositories>
>
> And I STILL see it pulling from:
>
> Downloading:
>
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-javadoc-plu
> gin/2.0-beta-3/maven-javadoc-plugin-2.0-beta-3.pom
> 1K downloaded
>
> I'm able to view this directory from firefox on a different machine
(and
> I tried with out that trailing / and no luck).
>
> How does this work folks?  Nothing seems to work like the
documentation
> says it does (sorry, but this is getting really frustrating).
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dan tran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 1:55 PM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: Internal (intranet) repositories
>
> sounds like a bug to me, since I also try to reproduce it and mvn -X
> does
> not give any
> indication that it references the configured repo before falling back
to
> to
> the default ones
>
> Perhaps, you can create a small test case and submit a jira.
>
> -Dan
>
>
>
> On 4/7/06, EJ Ciramella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Yup - and I like the idea, but haven't gotten that far yet.
> >
> > I'm still disappointed that the file:/// syntax doesn't work.
> >
> > I _just_ finished installing apache 2 and will try with http://
syntax
> > now.
> >
> > When I'm satisfied with these developments, I'll move on to trying
out
> > the proxy part of this.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rollo, Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 1:29 PM
> > To: EJ Ciramella; Maven Users List
> > Subject: RE: Internal (intranet) repositories
> >
> > Sorry if this have already been suggested and rejected, but: Have
you
> > considered using the maven-proxy to cache the ibiblio repo stuff on
an
> > internal machine?
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: EJ Ciramella [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 10:32 AM
> > To: Maven Users List
> > Subject: RE: Internal (intranet) repositories
> >
> > Bummer about the potential for a bug.  I know that the group working
> on
> > maven 2 things have submitted a "repository" directory in the
perforce
> > project (kinda exactly the opposite to what this feature in maven is
> > supposed to provide).
> >
> > But theirs works, but it seems to have to be a local copy.
> >
> > I'll try to bring up apache on that machine and see what happens.  I
> > kind of don't want to do this to an already complicated build
> > environment though.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wayne Fay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 12:33 AM
> > To: Maven Users List
> > Subject: Re: Internal (intranet) repositories
> >
> > Can you perhaps load that repository on a local Apache server and
> modify
> > the <repository> to reflect the HTTP repo, and see if it still fails
> to
> > attempt to access the local repo?
> >
> > Might be a bug in how Maven deals with file:/// repos. I know most
of
> us
> > on the list are using simple HTTP repos, so you might have just
> stumbled
> > into a new bug.
> >
> > Wayne
> >
> >
> > On 4/6/06, EJ Ciramella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Here is my pom file.  The directory in the url below is a shared
> > folder
> > > on a different machine.
> > >
> > > <project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0";
> > > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
> > >  xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0
> > > http://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd";>
> > >  <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
> > >  <groupId>com.ejstools.tool1</groupId>
> > >  <artifactId>tool1</artifactId>
> > >  <packaging>jar</packaging>
> > >  <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
> > >  <name>EJs Tools</name>
> > >  <url>http://build2.corp.upromise.com:8080</url>
> > >  <description>This project is simply here to lean about maven  and
> > > eventually will be used to build EJs Java tools.</description>
> > >   <repositories>
> > >     <repository>
> > >      <id>local</id>
> > >      <name>Upromise Maven Repository</name>
> > >      <url>file:///<servernamehere>/mavenrepository</url>
> > >     </repository>
> > >   </repositories>
> > >  <dependencies>
> > >    <dependency>
> > >      <groupId>junit</groupId>
> > >      <artifactId>junit</artifactId>
> > >      <version>3.8.1</version>
> > >      <scope>test</scope>
> > >    </dependency>
> > >  </dependencies>
> > >    <build>
> > >    <resources>
> > >      <resource>
> > >        <directory>src/main/resources</directory>
> > >        <filtering>true</filtering>
> > >      </resource>
> > >    </resources>
> > >  </build>
> > > </project>
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Wayne Fay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 6:12 PM
> > > To: Maven Users List
> > > Subject: Re: Internal (intranet) repositories
> > >
> > > Where exactly were you putting that repository section? In your
> > > pom.xml? Or in another configuration file?
> > >
> > > Wayne
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/6/06, EJ Ciramella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > None of this explains why it didn't use my repo and simply
ignored
> > it
> > > completely.
> > > >
> > > > This is the more important part of the puzzle.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------
> > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged
> or
> > confidential information.
> > It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even
> if
> > addressed incorrectly.
> > If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do
not
> > disclose, copy, distribute,
> > or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information;
> and
> > delete it from
> > your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
> >
> > Thank you for your compliance.
> > --------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to