sorry it is for maven1. What the technical difficulty prevent you from having only 1 plugin to handle all support platforms?
-D On 10/13/06, Dan Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i think there are works already done for launch4j plugin http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-176 On 10/13/06, pjungwir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > I'm writing a plugin for the launch4j tool. This tool wraps jar files in > windows executables so you don't have to deal with finding a jre, > setting > your classpath, etc. The distribution is a little bit different > depending on > whether you're running on linux, windows, solaris, or os x. I don't see > any > way around distributing the plugin four different ways. I'll just > include a > "-linux-" or "-win32-" or whatever in the name somewhere. So I'm > wondering: > is one part of the name better than another? Should I make this part of > the > groupId, the artifiactId, or the version? At first I thought the version > was > the best way to go, but I'm worried about whether this will confuse > maven's > efforts to get the latest version. Users should be able to say "get me > the > latest windows version" or whatever. So I'm thinking the artifactId is > the > best place. What do others think? > > Thanks, > Paul > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/plugin-naming-advice-tf2439526.html#a6802682 > > Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com<http://nabble.com/> > . > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
