Hi,

If you  want to see the list of dependencies and their scope for a POM, you
could try mvn dependency:tree
For further information on how to use the dependency plugin, have a look a
this link ;
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-dependency-plugin/examples/resolving-conflicts-using-the-dependency-tree.html


On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 6:04 AM, Ryan Moquin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I guess when I think about it, this looks like a stupid question because it
> could easily be that I excluded a dependency somewhere which caused the
> problem.  I positive that isn't the issue, but let's pretend it could be..
> is there any way to get a list of dependencies and what status maven
> considers them in?  Such as if they are excluded or included for whichever
> reasons?  I'm not sure how to troubleshoot this.. all I know is that it was
> working a few days ago and I have no idea why all of a sudden my project
> seems to be so problematic.. just hoping someone might have some
> suggestions
> on how to troubleshoot this.
>
> Thanks!
> Ryan
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Ryan Moquin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I have never really been able to figure this out and it's really driving
> me
> > up the wall at the moment.  Is there a time that Maven2 will
> automatically
> > exclude transitive dependencies?  Here is the scenario:
> >
> > I have 2 projects, then both include the exact same dependency.  When I
> > build the first library, it builds perfectly fine.  When I build the
> second
> > library, it files during the unit tests with NoClassDefFoundErrors.  If I
> > look at the dependencies being included, Maven2 isn't including the same
> > transitive dependencies from that common dependency between the two
> > projects.  Basically I have to include those transitive dependencies
> > explicitly, which I don't want to do.  What are the causes where Maven
> won't
> > include compile dependencies that a first level dependency is dependant
> on?
> > It seems very nondeterministic, so I'm guessing there are some nonobvious
> > reason behind the scenes for how it calculates this.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Ryan
> >
>

Reply via email to