Thanks, what version of AsyncWeb is it in the trunk? What would be the process of becoming a contributor for AsyncWeb?
-----Original Message----- From: Julien Vermillard [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 1:01 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: More active Asyncweb support Hi, Thanks for the feedback. Why you don't try the current trunk version : http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/asyncweb/trunk/ Asyncweb dev is stalled actually I hope to go back into it when I got more time, but I think we badly need new (or old back) contributors for AsyncWeb. Julien Le Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:25:31 +0530, "Panda, Archanaa IN GGN SISL" <[email protected]> a écrit : > Hello, > > There is I believe a large user community (including me) of mina > which would like to see more active asyncweb development. Recently > for one of my projects I used the safehaus asyncweb version in place > of servlets as my architecture needed asynchronous request > processing. This contributed (apart from other architecture changes) > in giving major scalability - almost 10X and though it is an old > version of asyncweb and MINA, there have been no problems I faced. > Asynchronous request processing is a feature that would be included > only in Servlet 3.0. Till the time it gets supported in all the major > app servers, the java community is banking on open source frameworks > like asyncweb, grizzly, etc for asynchronous request processing. > > Recently I downloaded grizzly source code to compare its support for > HTTP and NIO. Grizzly is being very actively supported > development-wise by Sun as it is the base of Glassfish. It has > recently also ported tomcat code to enable loadbalancing and proxying > by apache HTTP web-server. However, I found that the API of asyncweb > is easier to use than grizzly. Hence I am not yet keen to switch to > grizzly from asyncweb and I would like to see more active development > in asyncweb. Now the svn repository for safehaus asyncweb is no > longer available which is a little worrying for me as I don't have > the source code to make bug fixes if something goes wrong. > > Like I said, I really liked the asyncweb API and would really > appreciate if there is active development and a new release on it. If > that is not immediately feasible, can at least the safehaus asyncweb > source code be made available? > > Regards, > Archanaa > > Important notice: This e-mail and any attachment there to contains > corporate proprietary information. If you have received it by > mistake, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and delete this > e-mail and its attachments from your system. Thank You. Important notice: This e-mail and any attachment there to contains corporate proprietary information. If you have received it by mistake, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and delete this e-mail and its attachments from your system. Thank You.
