The thing I like about JSF managed beans is the clean EL syntax instead of the very verbose xml language (I have nothing against xml files but I do think we abuse its usage). I hope Spring IoC container adopt it one day if it is possible. But using annotations is going to be even better :) Can't wait!
On 1/12/06, Marco Mistroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all, > it seems to me that the Spring-JSF project allows you to scope beans... > isn't that so? > pls correct me if i m wrong./... > > regards > marco > > > > On 1/12/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Laurie Harper schrieb: > > > > > Spring provides a much more capable IoC solution than Faces alone; I > > > prefer to use it for everything I can, to get things like automatic > > > dependency injection. I'd use it to manage all my beans, but it doesn't > > > have support for scoping beans (i.e. request/session/application scope), > > > so for things that need to be scoped I use Faces. For everything *else* > > > I use Spring :-) > > > > > unfortunately yes, this is a huge problem, but the next major spring > > version will have the scopes of jsf to my knowledge, so the mess to > > have beans partially defined in jsf and partially defined in spring soon > > will have an end. > > > > > > -- Alexandre Poitras Québec, Canada
