> thingy.edit('X')
So what you need is UEL-2.2. No idea if gae supports this. Maybe there is an
option to get it (comes with Servlet-3.0). In this case you would not need to
do anything - but if gae doesn't support it, then you would most likely be
doomed :/
Maybe try asking Ali Ok, he did a few things on GAE in the past.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Sun, 12/5/10, ken keller <klr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: ken keller <klr...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: myfaces popularity
> To: "MyFaces Discussion" <users@myfaces.apache.org>
> Date: Sunday, December 5, 2010, 8:14 PM
> I don't see how CDI helps. I tried 3
> ways:
>
> X denotes the value of the ID.
>
> 1) Pass id as view param using h:link:
> <h:link value="edit" outcome="edit_thing">
> <f:param name="id" value="X"/>
> </h:link>
> and bind to pseudo-property named idToLoad in
> edit_thing.xhtml:
> <f:metadata>
> <f:viewParam name="id"
> value="#{thingy.idToLoad}"/>
> </f:metadata>
>
> 2) Pass id as view param using h:commandLink:
> <h:commandLink value="edit" action="#{thingy.edit}">
> <f:param name="id" value="X"/>
> </h:commandLink>
> Action method named edit() gets id from FacesContext:
> FacesContext.getCurrentInstance().getExternalContext().getRequestParameterMap().get("id");
> If that isn't inconvenient, what is? :)
>
> 3) Pass id as EL param using h:commandLink:
> <h:commandLink value="edit"
> action="#{thingy.edit('X')}">
> </h:commandLink>
> myfaces complains:
> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
> javax.el.ELResolver.invoke(Ljavax/el/ELContext;Ljava/lang/Object;Ljava/lang/Object;[Ljava/lang/Class;[Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/lang/Object;
> My action method is:
> public String edit(String id) { ... }
> My web.xml has:
> <context-param>
>
> <param-name>com.sun.faces.expressionFactory</param-name>
>
> <param-value>com.sun.el.ExpressionFactoryImpl</param-value>
> </context-param>
> <context-param>
>
> <param-name>org.apache.myfaces.EXPRESSION_FACTORY</param-name>
>
> <param-value>com.sun.el.ExpressionFactoryImpl</param-value>
> </context-param>
> My pom.xml has:
> <dependency>
> <groupId>javax.el</groupId>
> <artifactId>el-api</artifactId>
> <version>2.2</version>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.glassfish.web</groupId>
> <artifactId>el-impl</artifactId>
> <version>2.2</version>
> </dependency>
> I don't know why this fails.
>
> What's the best style?
>
> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Gerhard <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > short addition:
> >
> > with myfaces codi also beans annotated with
> @ManagedBean are normal cdi
> > beans (automatically).
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
> >
> > 2010/12/4 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
> >
> > > +1, with CDI you would be able to simply @Inject
> all your needed
> > > parameters. In general I'd say that one should
> generally use CDI instead
> > of
> > > the JSF @ManagedBean mechanism.
> > >
> > > LieGrue,
> > > strub
> > >
> > > --- On Sat, 12/4/10, Jakob Korherr <jakob.korh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Jakob Korherr <jakob.korh...@gmail.com>
> > > > Subject: Re: myfaces popularity
> > > > To: "MyFaces Discussion" <users@myfaces.apache.org>
> > > > Date: Saturday, December 4, 2010, 3:45 PM
> > > > ... or, you know, use CDI for your
> > > > managed beans ;)
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Jakob
> > > >
> > > > 2010/12/4 Jakob Korherr <jakob.korh...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry, I just skimmed your mail, but
> for your last
> > > > point
> > > > >
> > > > >>Finally, what's the correct way to
> implement an
> > > > editor action? The managed
> > > > >>bean needs to be initialized before
> rendering it.
> > > > So instead of invoking the
> > > > >>no-arg constructor, I want something
> like:
> > > > >>Foo(id)
> > > > >>to be invoked.
> > > > >
> > > > > you can use a no-arg constructor and an
> init method
> > > > annotated with
> > > > > @PostConstruct. So something like
> this:
> > > > >
> > > > > @PostConstruct
> > > > > private void init() { // init bean here
> }
> > > > >
> > > > > However, you can't pass arguments
> neither to the
> > > > constructor nor to
> > > > > this init method. You need to 1) get
> everything you
> > > > need from the
> > > > > context or 2) set them from outside via
> setter
> > > > methods.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hope this helps.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Jakob
> > > > >
> > > > > 2010/12/3 ken keller <klr...@gmail.com>:
> > > > >> My last startup is
> www.collectrium.com. We use
> > > > AWS/py/django. This was my
> > > > >> first non-Java app & I missed
> strong typing.
> > > > django's template language is
> > > > >> verbose & there's not much of a
> widget
> > > > library. So I'm back to Java. AWS
> > > > >> avoids setting up a data center (as
> co-founder of
> > > > IGN.com, I don't miss
> > > > >> managing 1,000 servers) but one
> still must manage
> > > > the OS & scaling. So I'm
> > > > >> trying appengine.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> jsf's attractions are validation,
> data binding,
> > > > component model, component
> > > > >> libraries. Too bad it doesn't
> include safe HTML
> > > > (ala
> > > > >>
> > > http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/ReleaseNotes.html#SafeHtml)
> > > > but
> > > > >> it should be easy to wrap text
> components. Too bad
> > > > the component library
> > > > >> suppliers won't rally around a
> standard
> > > > look-&-feel so one could mix
> > > > >> components.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I like gwt but it doesn't have
> validation &
> > > > SEO is too hard. I might use gwt
> > > > >> for editing functionality & a
> lightweight
> > > > template language (which doesn't
> > > > >> require a servlet container or mock
> for unit
> > > > testing) like freemarker for
> > > > >> browsing functionality.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> My current startup is a
> productivity tool in the
> > > > cloud. I hope it will be
> > > > >> used by many people of course.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I'm using IntelliJ & appengine
> 1.3.8. From my
> > > > web.xml:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> <context-param>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> <param-name>com.sun.faces.expressionFactory</param-name>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> <param-value>com.sun.el.ExpressionFactoryImpl</param-value>
> > > > >> </context-param>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> From my pom.xml:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> <dependency>
> > > >
> >> <groupId>javax.el</groupId>
> > > >
> >> <artifactId>el-api</artifactId>
> > > >
> >> <version>2.2</version>
> > > >
> >> </dependency>
> > > >
> >> <dependency>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> <groupId>org.glassfish.web</groupId>
> > > >
> >> <artifactId>el-impl</artifactId>
> > > >
> >> <version>2.2</version>
> > > >
> >> </dependency>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> When I run the app, the log shows:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> INFO: Either you haven't specified
> the
> > > > ExpressionFactory implementation, or
> > > > >> an error occured while
> instantiating the
> > > > implementation you've specified.
> > > > >> However, attempting to load a
> known
> > > > implementation.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The app works but I wonder why.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I'm having trouble w/ primefaces
> too.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Finally, what's the correct way to
> implement an
> > > > editor action? The managed
> > > > >> bean needs to be initialized before
> rendering it.
> > > > So instead of invoking the
> > > > >> no-arg constructor, I want
> something like:
> > > > >> Foo(id)
> > > > >> to be invoked.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:04 AM,
> Kito Mann <kito.m...@virtua.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Hello Ken,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> There's definitely a lot of
> activity in the
> > > > JSF world, and it's used by a
> > > > >>> lot of large and smaller
> companies (see
> > > http://www.javaserverfaces.org/for
> > > > >>> a list of sites built using JSF
> or Seam under
> > > > "JSF in Production"). There
> > > > >>> are a variety of industries,
> but it's quite
> > > > popular in Finance (banks and
> > > > >>> insurance companies).
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> In terms of active development,
> you can just
> > > > look at the recent releases to
> > > > >>> see there's a lot going on.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> It's worthwhile also to point
> out that
> > > > Trinidad is used as the foundation
> > > > >>> for all of the Oracle Fusion
> applications.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> What sort of application is
> your startup
> > > > intending to build with MyFaces?
> > > > >>> ---
> > > > >>> Kito D. Mann | twitter: kito99
> | Author, JSF
> > > > in Action
> > > > >>> Virtua, Inc. | http://www.virtua.com | JSF/Java EE
> > > > training and consulting
> > > > >>> http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer
> > > > Faces FAQ, news, and info |
> > > > >>> twitter:
> > > > >>> jsfcentral
> > > > >>> +1 203-404-4848 x3
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Public JSF 2 Training this
> January in London:
> > > > JSF 2 Update for JSF 1.x
> > > > >>> users
> > > > >>> (http://bit.ly/jsf2updatecourse<
> > > > >>> http://skillsmatter.com/course/java-jee/jsf2-update-course>)
> > > > >>> and JSF 2 in Action
> > > > >>> (http://bit.ly/jsf2course<
> > > > >>> http://skillsmatter.com/course/java-jee/jsf-and-ajax>
> > > > >>> )
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 11:44
> AM, ken keller
> > > > <klr...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> > 1Mpvs/day on which URL?
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > mojarra looks inactive:
> > > > >>> > http://java.net/projects/mojarra/lists
> > > > >>> > The richfaces team seems
> to prefer
> > > > mojarra to myfaces. Given the effort
> > > > >>> > being devoted to richfaces
> &
> > > > primefaces atop jsf2, one would think there
> > > > >>> > would be much more
> activity on the
> > > > lists.
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > I've posted twice over the
> last few
> > > > months about
> > > > >>> >
> > > >
> javax.faces.application.ViewExpiredException
> > > > >>> > thrown on appengine but
> nobody replied.
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > http://www.irian.at/myfaces_support
> > > > >>> > costs $5,300/yr for basic
> > > > support--$10,600 for advanced. My startup
> can't
> > > > >>> > afford this--especially
> without trying it
> > > > first--perhaps a paygo option.
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > I haven't studied the
> source code to see
> > > > if there's unit testing.
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > As compelling as jsf2 is,
> I'm scared to
> > > > bet my startup on it.
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at
> 12:30 AM, Mark
> > > > Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
> > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > > Hi!
> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >>> > > With the pretty fast
> development on
> > > > the spec side (last year 2.0, last
> > > > >>> > week
> > > > >>> > > 2.1 - thanks Ed!)
> there is a very
> > > > steady development going on atm. Also
> > > > >>> > > remember that EE6 is
> pretty fresh.
> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >>> > > So while there is
> currently not that
> > > > much traffic on the us...@mf list
> > > > >>> > > there is pretty much
> of it on the
> > > > dev list atm.
> > > > >>> > > The move from JSF-1.x
> to JSF-2.x is
> > > > still to be done for most of the
> > > > >>> > legacy
> > > > >>> > > projects, but there
> are a few JFS-2
> > > > projects already in production with
> > > > >>> > lot
> > > > >>> > > of success (we
> currently serve ~ 1
> > > > mio page hits per day with
> > > > >>> MyFaces-2,
> > > > >>> > > OpenWebBeans, CODI,
> OpenJPA2 and our
> > > > servers are pretty 'cold')
> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >>> > > LieGrue,
> > > > >>> > > strub
> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >>> > > --- On Fri, 12/3/10,
> Matthias
> > > > Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >>> > > > From: Matthias
> Wessendorf
> > > > <mat...@apache.org>
> > > > >>> > > > Subject: Re:
> myfaces
> > > > popularity
> > > > >>> > > > To: "MyFaces
> Discussion" <users@myfaces.apache.org>
> > > > >>> > > > Date: Friday,
> December 3, 2010,
> > > > 7:44 AM
> > > > >>> > > > On Fri, Dec 3,
> 2010 at 7:28 AM,
> > > > ken
> > > > >>> > > > keller <klr...@gmail.com>
> > > > >>> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>> > > > > This
> mailing list isn't
> > > > very active. Most of the
> > > > >>> > > > messages seem to
> be about
> > > > >>> > > > > component
> libs like
> > > > Trinidad.
> > > > >>> > > > >
> > > > >>> > > > > Is myfaces
> popular?
> > > > >>> > > >
> > > > >>> > > > yes it is.
> > > > >>> > > >
> > > > >>> > > > >
> > > > >>> > > > > Wouldn't a
> searchable
> > > > group be more convenient than a
> > > > >>> > > > mailing list?
> > > > >>> > > >
> > > > >>> > > > the archives
> *are* searchable
> > > > (e.g. markmail).
> > > > >>> > > >
> > > > >>> > > > >
> > > > >>> > > >
> > > > >>> > > >
> > > > >>> > > >
> > > > >>> > > > --
> > > > >>> > > > Matthias
> Wessendorf
> > > > >>> > > >
> > > > >>> > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > >>> > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > >>> > > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> > > > >>> > > >
> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Jakob Korherr
> > > > >
> > > > > blog: http://www.jakobk.com
> > > > > twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr
> > > > > work: http://www.irian.at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jakob Korherr
> > > >
> > > > blog: http://www.jakobk.com
> > > > twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr
> > > > work: http://www.irian.at
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
