Hi Kito, Google alerts showed me this message and raised my curiosity. I wanted to find out how bad GlassFish is broken :-)
CDI 1.1 discussions are all happening in open and you can support your case at: https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev or githib: https://github.com/pmuir/cdi/wiki -Arun On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Kito Mann <kito.m...@virtua.com> wrote: > Hello Arun, > > Glad to see you here. Not only is it good for CDI, but it's good for me, > since I'm looking into using Glassfish. > > While you're on it, please push for portlet support in Weld :-). > --- > Kito D. Mann | twitter: kito99 | Author, JSF in Action > Virtua, Inc. | http://www.virtua.com | JSF/Java EE training and consulting > http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info | twitter: > jsfcentral > +1 203-404-4848 x3 > > * Listen to the latest headlines in the JSF and Java EE newscast: > http://blogs.jsfcentral.com/roller/editorsdesk/category/JSF+and+Java+EE+Newscast > * See you at JAX and JSF Summit 2011 June 20-23rd in San Jose: > http://jaxconf.com/ > > > On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 4:04 PM, arungupta <arun.gu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Hi Mark, >> >> >> struberg wrote: >> > >> > The result: >> > >> > Please skip glassfish-3.1 ! >> > >> > It's really completely broken. It has lots of errors not only in Weld but >> > also in the Mojarra integration it ships (from minor glitches to not >> > finding the FacesContext because the lookup integration seems completely >> > messed up)! >> > Most of my tested projects even refused to start at all! >> > >> >> Can you share more details of your tests ? Did you file any bugs ? I know >> several folks using GlassFish in production with Mojarra + PrimeFaces + >> CDI. >> >> >> struberg wrote: >> > >> > The solution: use glassfish-3.2-SNAPSHOT (*)! >> > I was at least able to start a few samples successfully. There are still >> a >> > few fixes needed (moving around beans.xml info, extracting jars to >> > WEB-INF/classes, EAR scenario completely fucked up when using >> Extensions), >> > but for a WAR deployment it's sufficient... >> > >> >> GlassFish 3.2 has Weld 1.1 so that might have solved some of the issues you >> faced. >> >> >> struberg wrote: >> > >> > Oh yea, I did a 'bit' more than just a simple hello webworld - but not >> too >> > much. The projects were still pretty small. >> > >> >> Can you share your samples so that I can try it as well ? >> >> Thanks, >> -Arun >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://old.nabble.com/-FYI--testing-CODI-and-Seam3-with-glassfish-tp31676813p31724974.html >> Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > -- twitter.com/arungupta blogs.sun.com/arungupta
