Hello Bjorn,

Do you have component bindings in your page (i.e <h:myComponent
binding="#{myBean.comp}"/>)? That causes the exact behavior you're
describing in versions of JSF prior to 2.2. What version of MyFaces are you
using?

___

Kito D. Mann | @kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
Virtua, Inc. | http://www.virtua.com | JSF/Java EE training and consulting
http://www.JSFCentral.com | @jsfcentral
+1 203-998-0403

* Listen to the Enterprise Java Newscast: *http://
<http://blogs.jsfcentral.com/JSFNewscast/>enterprisejavanews.com
<http://ww.enterprisejavanews.com>*
* JSFCentral Interviews Podcast:
http://www.jsfcentral.com/resources/jsfcentralpodcasts/
* Sign up for the JSFCentral Newsletter: http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Bjørn T Johansen <b...@havleik.no> wrote:

> I trying to create a webapplication using request and/or viewscope instead
> of sessionscope, which I have always used... (Neved needed to concern
> myself with memory usage in the apps I have implemented.. :) )
> But I now have a problem using @ViewScoped..
> When I access index.xhtml which uses a managed bean in viewscope, the
> constructor is called multiple times. And the same with an init method, that
> should be called only once. I am using..:
>
> <f:metadata>
>     <f:viewAction action="#{calendarController.initPrices}" />
> </f:metadata>
>
> <h:head>......
>
> to call the init method, but I have also tried using f:event prerenderView
> and also @PostConstruct but I am not able to make the bean call the init
> method only once...
>
> What am I missing?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> BTJ
> --
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Bjørn T Johansen
>
> b...@havleik.no
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Someone wrote:
> "I understand that if you play a Windows CD backwards you hear strange
> Satanic messages"
> To which someone replied:
> "It's even worse than that; play it forwards and it installs Windows"
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>

Reply via email to