Constructor is called multiple times by design - thats how object serialization works. Serislization is enabled by default in myfaces to support clustering/failover.
No clue about viewaction - i cant use jsf 2.2. Am Freitag, 7. November 2014 schrieb Bjørn T Johansen : > 2.2, like this.: > > <faces-config xmlns="http://xmlns.jcp.org/xml/ns/javaee" > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" > xsi:schemaLocation="http://xmlns.jcp.org/xml/ns/javaee > http://xmlns.jcp.org/xml/ns/javaee/web-facesconfig_2_2.xsd" > version="2.2"> > > > No, javax.faces.PARTIAL_STATE_SAVING is set to true... > > > BTJ > > On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 16:21:29 -0500 > Kito Mann <kito.m...@virtua.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > OK. What version do you have in your faces-config.xml file? Also, do you > > have javax.faces.PARTIAL_STATE_SAVING set to false in web.xml? > > > > ___ > > > > Kito D. Mann | @kito99 | Author, JSF in Action > > Virtua, Inc. | http://www.virtua.com | JSF/Java EE training and > consulting > > http://www.JSFCentral.com | @jsfcentral > > +1 203-998-0403 > > > > * Listen to the Enterprise Java Newscast: *http:// > > <http://blogs.jsfcentral.com/JSFNewscast/>enterprisejavanews.com > > <http://ww.enterprisejavanews.com>* > > * JSFCentral Interviews Podcast: > > http://www.jsfcentral.com/resources/jsfcentralpodcasts/ > > * Sign up for the JSFCentral Newsletter: > http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17 > > > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Bjørn T Johansen <b...@havleik.no > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > No bindings... And using Myfaces 2.2.5.... > > > > > > BTJ > > > > > > On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 15:57:00 -0500 > > > Kito Mann <kito.m...@virtua.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > Hello Bjorn, > > > > > > > > Do you have component bindings in your page (i.e <h:myComponent > > > > binding="#{myBean.comp}"/>)? That causes the exact behavior you're > > > > describing in versions of JSF prior to 2.2. What version of MyFaces > are > > > you > > > > using? > > > > > > > > ___ > > > > > > > > Kito D. Mann | @kito99 | Author, JSF in Action > > > > Virtua, Inc. | http://www.virtua.com | JSF/Java EE training and > > > consulting > > > > http://www.JSFCentral.com | @jsfcentral > > > > +1 203-998-0403 > > > > > > > > * Listen to the Enterprise Java Newscast: *http:// > > > > <http://blogs.jsfcentral.com/JSFNewscast/>enterprisejavanews.com > > > > <http://ww.enterprisejavanews.com>* > > > > * JSFCentral Interviews Podcast: > > > > http://www.jsfcentral.com/resources/jsfcentralpodcasts/ > > > > * Sign up for the JSFCentral Newsletter: > > > http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17 > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Bjørn T Johansen <b...@havleik.no > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I trying to create a webapplication using request and/or viewscope > > > instead > > > > > of sessionscope, which I have always used... (Neved needed to > concern > > > > > myself with memory usage in the apps I have implemented.. :) ) > > > > > But I now have a problem using @ViewScoped.. > > > > > When I access index.xhtml which uses a managed bean in viewscope, > the > > > > > constructor is called multiple times. And the same with an init > > > method, that > > > > > should be called only once. I am using..: > > > > > > > > > > <f:metadata> > > > > > <f:viewAction action="#{calendarController.initPrices}" /> > > > > > </f:metadata> > > > > > > > > > > <h:head>...... > > > > > > > > > > to call the init method, but I have also tried using f:event > > > prerenderView > > > > > and also @PostConstruct but I am not able to make the bean call the > > > init > > > > > method only once... > > > > > > > > > > What am I missing? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > BTJ > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > Bjørn T Johansen > > > > > > > > > > b...@havleik.no <javascript:;> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > Someone wrote: > > > > > "I understand that if you play a Windows CD backwards you hear > strange > > > > > Satanic messages" > > > > > To which someone replied: > > > > > "It's even worse than that; play it forwards and it installs > Windows" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > >