"Explicit support of Java EE 8 is not currently part of Apache NetBeans 11.0. Also, JavaEE 8 only runs on JDK 8, not on later releases, and so if you 're doing development with JavaEE 8 it’s best to run NetBeans itself on JDK 8."
From: https://netbeans.apache.org/download/nb110/index.html Gj On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 2:36 PM Richard Grin <richard.g...@univ-cotedazur.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > I have just tried NetBeans 11 and I am a bit disappointed. > > My environment: Windows 10 64 bit, openjdk 11 2018-09-25. > NetBeans is running over Java 10.0.1. GlassFish 5.1 (and Payara) from > Eclipse is running over JDK 8. > > Goal: creation of a Web application for Java EE 8 > > 1. Creation of a Web Java project with Maven : > I choose "Java with Maven" > "Web Application". > Message: "This feature is not yet enabled. Press Next to activate it. > Maven Web Application project template, created with Maven Archetype > Plugin". > I click Next. New page "Finding Feature" without any message nor > information about the finding. I don't know what it's happening. > After a long time I cancel because nothing happens. However, Yesterday the > process went a little farther ("Oracle JS Parser Implementation (1.0) was > loaded), but without success at the end. > > 2. Creation of a Web application with ant. > *It's not possible to choose Java EE 8*. The only options are Java EE 7, > 6, 5. I choose Java EE 7. > Next. I check JavaServer Faces. In the tab "Libraries" I choose Server > Library. The project is created. > I install nbjavac (1.6). > New entity classes from database (from sample). Problem because > javax.persistence is not known. However, it is in jakarta.persistence.jar > provided by Eclipse GlassFish 5.1. How can I tell NetBeans where are the > jars? > If I change the server, Payara 5.184 instead of Eclipse GlassFish 5.1, it > works. > > I liked a lot NetBeans because it was simple to create Web and Enterprise > Applications and I was looking forward to trying the first version of > Apache NetBeans for these types of application but It seems not to be > really ready for this task. Or perhaps I made a mistake? >
