Jens, Thanks for reporting this. I finally got around to digging in to see what’s happening. I filed a Jira [1] for this. I was able to replicate it pretty easily - thanks for the very well-documented steps! I should have a fix up shortly, I think.
Thanks -Mark [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-8238 On Jan 29, 2021, at 1:28 AM, Jens M. Kofoed <jmkofoed....@gmail.com<mailto:jmkofoed....@gmail.com>> wrote: Hey I have found the reason to why it is not working. to reproduce this issue: 1. Create an empty Process Group (PG-Root) 2. Add version control to the PG-Root 3. Add an empty PG (PG-Sub) in PG-Root 4. Add version control to PG-Sub 5. Update PG-Root 6. Check that both PG-Root and PG-Sub are up-to-date with the green check mark 7. Change "Process Group FlowFile Concurrency" to "Single FlowFile Per Node" for the PG-Sub 8. Commit changes to PR-Sub 9. Refresh page 10. PG-Sub should have a green check mark, and PG-Root still has local changes 11. Commit changes to PG-Root 12. PG-Root is still showing it has local changes, but it has not. Kind regards Jens Den tor. 28. jan. 2021 kl. 07.51 skrev Jens M. Kofoed <jmkofoed....@gmail.com<mailto:jmkofoed....@gmail.com>>: I have tried to import all version flows to another NIFI server. It shows the same picture. kind regards Jens Den tor. 28. jan. 2021 kl. 07.40 skrev Jens M. Kofoed <jmkofoed....@gmail.com<mailto:jmkofoed....@gmail.com>>: Hi I have tried to compare the 11 flows which is in the same bucket. All 11 flows is using the same parameter context. 9 flows have nested flows which it also under version control. All 5 flows which have issue have nested flows, but there are 4 flows with nested flows which have no issue. 4 of the 5 flows have 2 sub-flows which have a newer version. But in the 5th flow, all sub-flows is up to date. If updating the sub-flows to latest version, they continually show they need update even after updated to latest version. Kind Regards Jens Den tor. 28. jan. 2021 kl. 07.13 skrev Jens M. Kofoed <jmkofoed....@gmail.com<mailto:jmkofoed....@gmail.com>>: Hi Bryan I just tried to create a new process group importing from registry. As soon the new process group is created it show the *, and moving the cursor over the star it says: Tracking to "xxx" Version 7 in "yyyy". Local changes have been made". Going to show local changes, there are none listed and closing the window a new windows popup saying: This process Group does not have any local changes. See attach screen dumps. I all so tried another group, which has neested groups with version control. Here one of the neested groups has been changed to a newer version. So the the new root group says there are groups which needs update. Going to the subgroup which need updates I can see the saved version is 3 and the newest version is 5. So I update the subgroup to lates version. Now it still shows it needs update. Going in again for updating the subgroup it says current version 5, newest version to select is 5. If have all so tried to create a new groups for all our version controlled groups. It is only one bucket which has problems and in this bucket it is 5 out of 11 flows which has issues. First I thought it might has something to do with Parameter Context since this bucket is the only one where Parameter context is used. But some of the flows which has no issues is all so using parameter context. I'm not able to find the needle, which is in common for only those 5 flows Kind regards Jens Den ons. 27. jan. 2021 kl. 17.06 skrev Bryan Bende <bbe...@gmail.com<mailto:bbe...@gmail.com>>: Jens, Is there any pattern you can identify for how to reproduce the problem? If you were to create a brand new empty process group and start version control, does the problem happen? is there a specific set of steps after that which would put it into this state? -Bryan On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 10:36 AM Juan Pablo Gardella <gardellajuanpa...@gmail.com<mailto:gardellajuanpa...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Any guide that explains how a process group can be graduated to upper > environments? > > On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 at 12:33, Joe Witt > <joe.w...@gmail.com<mailto:joe.w...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> There is no requirement to use the registry. It simply gives you a way to >> store versioned flows which you can reference/use from zero or more nifi >> clusters/flows to help keep things in line. Many teams use this to ensure >> as flows are improved over time and worked through dev/test/stage/prod >> environments that they graduate properly. >> >> Thanks >> >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 8:31 AM Maksym Skrynnikov >> <skrynnikov.mak...@verizonmedia.com<mailto:skrynnikov.mak...@verizonmedia.com>> >> wrote: >>> >>> We use NiFi of version 1.12.1 but we do not use NiFi Registry, I wonder if >>> that's the requirement to use the registry? >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 2:25 PM Bryan Bende >>> <bbe...@gmail.com<mailto:bbe...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Please specify the versions of NiFi and NiFi Registry. If it is not >>>> the latest (1.12.1 and 0.8.0), then it would be good to try with the >>>> latest since there have been significant improvements around this area >>>> in the last few releases. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:45 AM Jens M. Kofoed >>>> <jmkofoed....@gmail.com<mailto:jmkofoed....@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Hi >>>> > >>>> > We have a situation where process groups in NIFI shows they are not up >>>> > to date in version control. The show a *. But going to version control >>>> > to see local changes, there are none. >>>> > NIFI reports back, there are no local changes. Submitting a new version, >>>> > makes no different. A new version is created, but NIFI still shows the * >>>> > and not the green check mark. >>>> > >>>> > I have tried to restart Registry which doesn't help. >>>> > >>>> > Restarting NIFI help for a short while. After restaring NIFI the process >>>> > group show the green check mark and another group which is under the >>>> > same version control now shows it needed an update. After updating the >>>> > 2nd process group to the new version this process group now shows the * >>>> > and not the green check mark. Going to version control to see local >>>> > changes, there are none. >>>> > >>>> > Anybody who have experience with this issue? >>>> > >>>> > bug repport created: >>>> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_browse_NIFIREG-2D437-3F&d=DwIFaQ&c=sWW_bEwW_mLyN3Kx2v57Q8e-CRbmiT9yOhqES_g_wVY&r=nRtn9-9qg4PKzRb3YqAHXrLTXJYN1G0ZisUsm-XYLkObBvdpApuffGYoI9OPgBKm&m=Z9hTZ0OdCBCst-23EzCV6YNkdOQs--8BkHDlBqQlU2k&s=YVW9lyT5J-D2oUEeIGACI2vGYBHemlqdwupU_Q_5HuU&e= >>>> > >>>> > kind regards >>>> > >>>> > Jens M. Kofoed
