Kevin,
I finally got past the issue of running out of connections - I simply
configured connections pooling via DBCP and the problem went away. I
still consider this a "work-around" because if I have a single
process/thread persisting entities, I would expect each step of the
way to complete in a synchronous fashion and be able to use just one
connection to do that.
Before I tried configuring connection pooling, I was trying to isolate
the code in OpenJPA that was using up all the connections and it
appears to be occurring in the OpenJPA sequence generator code, in or
about:
org.apache.openjpa.kernel.StateManagerImpl.assignObjectId()
org.apache.openjpa.kernel.JDBCStoreManager.assignObjectId()
org.apache.openjpa.kernel.AbstractJDBCSeq.next()
org.apache.openjpa.kernel.NativeJDBCSeq.nextInternal()
My entity's annotations that invoke this are:
@Id
@SequenceGenerator(name="MARKET_DATA_MARKETDATAID_GENERATOR",
sequenceName="MARKET_DATA_ID_SEQ")
@GeneratedValue(strategy=GenerationType.SEQUENCE,
generator="MARKET_DATA_MARKETDATAID_GENERATOR")
@Column(name="MARKET_DATA_ID", unique=true, nullable=false,
precision=19)
public long getMarketDataId() {
return this.marketDataId;
}
For now, I will just hope connection pooling will be sufficient to
solve this issue, but I am wondering if your unit tests are running
with pooling or not? If they are, you may be missing a problem.
Thanks,
Chris
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Chris Wolf <cwolf.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kevin,
>
> Thanks again, I'll look into the logging thing later - you're right
> that I'm more focused on just getting persistence to work and so I'm
> using the debugger. For now, it's just a JSE app, so no JTA yet (but
> that's what's targeted).
>
> So in addition to the programmatic transaction management via Spring
> JpaTransactionManager, ( which
> suppressed the out-of-connections issue but silently didn't write to
> the DB), I tried a third approach -
> Spring-managed transactions via Spring's TransactionTemplate and
> callbacks, but that only got me back to where
> I started, which is the connections running out again, plus hideous
> code, as you can see, below.
>
>
> Ok, I'll keep hammering away at it. Thanks,
>
> -Chris
>
>
> static void saveToDB(final List<MdBaseData> data) throws Exception {
> EntityManagerFactory emf = Persistence
> .createEntityManagerFactory("marketdata");
>
> final JpaTemplate jpaTempl = new JpaTemplate(emf);
> jpaTempl.afterPropertiesSet();
>
> JpaTransactionManager jpaTxMgr = new
> JpaTransactionManager(emf);
> jpaTxMgr.afterPropertiesSet();
>
> final TransactionTemplate txTmpl = new
> TransactionTemplate(jpaTxMgr);
> txTmpl.afterPropertiesSet();
>
> TransactionStrategy txStrategy = new TransactionStrategy() {
> @SuppressWarnings("deprecation")
> public Object execute(final JpaCallback<?> callback) {
> return txTmpl.execute(new
> TransactionCallback<Object>() {
> public Object
> doInTransaction(TransactionStatus status) {
> return jpaTempl.execute(new
> JpaCallback<Object>() {
> public Object
> doInJpa(EntityManager entityManager)
>
> throws PersistenceException {
> return
> callback.doInJpa(entityManager);
> }
> });
> }
> });
> }
> };
>
> txStrategy.execute(new JpaCallback<Object>() {
> @Override
> public Object doInJpa(EntityManager em) throws
> PersistenceException {
> for (MdBaseData bd : data) {
> em.persist(bd);
> }
> return null; // writing to db, not reading...
> }
> });
> }
>
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Kevin Sutter <kwsut...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Not certain what you meant by "join EM to the transaction".
>> If an EM is created without knowledge of a containing JTA transaction, then
>> the EM and the JTA transaction won't automatically be linked. Thus, if you
>> start the transaction after the EM was created, you can use the
>> EM.joinTransaction() method to get the two hooked up. This is, of course,
>> assuming that the Spring-initiated transaction is a JTA transaction. If
>> it's not, then you'll have to reference the Spring documentation to figure
>> out how the EM and transaction are linked.
>>
>>> BTW, I don't know if you noticed my previous post about logging, but I
>> tried setting openjpa.Log = slf4j
>> Yes, I did notice. But, since you seemed to have been making progress, I
>> figured you had figured something out... I'm not a slf4j expert, but I do
>> know other users have had success with integrating openjpa with slf4j. I
>> would guess it's an issue with the properties you are setting and how they
>> get mapped to OpenJPA's properties. If you are setting properties like
>> this:
>>
>> log4j.category.openjpa.jdbc.JDBC=TRACE
>>
>> .. OpenJPA wouldn't know what to do with this. I would try setting the
>> properties for OpenJPA's logging in the same format for the persistence.xml:
>>
>> <property name="openjpa.Log" value="openjpa.jdbc.JDBC=TRACE"/>
>>
>> At least that's what I would expect. Somehow the configuration would still
>> have to map to properties that OpenJPA knows about. Otherwise, our tracing
>> code wouldn't know when or what to trace. I know there's some mapping code
>> like this for Log4J and WebSphere and maybe others. But, the combination
>> of slf4j and log4j might be throwing things off... Just an idea.
>>
>> Kevin
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Chris Wolf <cwolf.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Kevin Sutter <kwsut...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > So, which do you want? Lots of connections, or data getting to the
>>> > database? :-)
>>>
>>> Preferably the later. ;)
>>>
>>> >
>>> > Try starting the spring transaction before creating the EM. Either that,
>>> > or join the EM to the transaction.
>>>
>>> I tried the former - it didn't change the outcome. Not certain what
>>> you meant by "join EM to the transaction".
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> BTW, I don't know if you noticed my previous post about logging, but I
>>> tried setting openjpa.Log = slf4j
>>> and that didn't work - no errors, just no addtional output.
>>>
>>> Thanks for helping so far...
>>>
>>> >
>>> > Kevin
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Chris Wolf <cwolf.a...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Kevin,
>>> >>
>>> >> Someone on the us...@apache.camel.org mailing list suggested that I
>>> >> let Springframework manage the transactions, so I changed my code to
>>> >> look like:
>>> >>
>>> >> The apparent connection "leak" went away, and no exceptions are
>>> >> thrown, and I only see one connection being opened, as expected -
>>> >> however, nothing goes into the database.
>>> >>
>>> >> static void saveToDB(List<MdBaseData> data) throws Exception {
>>> >> EntityManagerFactory emf = Persistence
>>> >>
>>> .createEntityManagerFactory("marketdata");
>>> >> JpaTransactionManager jpaTxMgr = new
>>> >> JpaTransactionManager(emf);
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> EntityManager em =
>>> >>
>>> >> jpaTxMgr.getEntityManagerFactory().createEntityManager();
>>> >> TransactionStatus txStatus =
>>> >> jpaTxMgr.getTransaction(new
>>> >> DefaultTransactionDefinition());
>>> >> try {
>>> >> //em.getTransaction().begin();
>>> >> for (MdBaseData bd : data) {
>>> >> em.persist(bd);
>>> >> }
>>> >> //em.getTransaction().commit();
>>> >> jpaTxMgr.commit(txStatus);
>>> >> } catch (Exception e) {
>>> >> jpaTxMgr.rollback(txStatus);
>>> >> e.printStackTrace();
>>> >> } finally {
>>> >> em.close();
>>> >> }
>>> >> }
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Chris Wolf <cwolf.a...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> > Even more specifically, I drilled down into the guts of OpenJPA-2.1,
>>> >> > into the call to
>>> >> > EntityManager.getTransaction().begin();
>>> >> >
>>> >> > The place were all the connections are opened until exhausted is in:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > org.apache.openjpa.kernel.BrokerImpl.flush(int reason)
>>> >> >
>>> >> > There is a loop where the connections are all being opened:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Collection mobjs = null;
>>> >> > _flags |= FLAG_PRESTORING;
>>> >> > try {
>>> >> > if (flush) {
>>> >> > // call pre store on all currently transactional objs
>>> >> > for (Iterator itr = transactional.iterator();
>>> >> > itr.hasNext();) //<=== EATING UP ALL CONNECTIONS
>>> >> > ((StateManagerImpl)
>>> itr.next()).beforeFlush(reason,
>>> >> _call);
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Let me know if there's anything else I can to do help solve this
>>> issue.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Thanks,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > -Chris
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Chris Wolf <cwolf.a...@gmail.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> >> Kevin,
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> I isolated where all the connections are opened at once - upon
>>> calling
>>> >> >> entityManager.getTransaction().commit();
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> I assume this is correct from all the exampled I've seen so far...
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> EntityManager entityManager =
>>> >> >> entityManagerFactory.createEntityManager(); // here is where just one
>>> >> >> connection is opened, as expected. (not using connection pool yet)
>>> >> >> entityManager.getTransaction().begin();
>>> >> >> for (MdBaseData bd : data) {
>>> >> >> em.persist(bd);
>>> >> >> }
>>> >> >> entityManager.getTransaction().commit(); // here is where all the
>>> >> >> connections are opened *****
>>> >> >> entityManager.close();
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Note that the entity has a M2M to child entities (about 100 per
>>> >> >> MdBaseData) via a link table.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Thanks for any ideas,
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> -Chris
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Kevin Sutter <kwsut...@gmail.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> >>> Hi Chris,
>>> >> >>> Good to know your plans. Thanks.
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> You can get almost all of the JDBC connection access via the JDBC
>>> >> channel
>>> >> >>> in our logging framework [1]. Unfortunately, I looked at the code
>>> and
>>> >> the
>>> >> >>> constructors don't seem to have a log entry... :-( But, you do get
>>> >> all of
>>> >> >>> the closes, commits, rollbacks, etc -- all of the normal operations
>>> >> through
>>> >> >>> a Connection object. So, I'd start with that.
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> Updating the Ctor for additional logging would be very easy to do.
>>> I
>>> >> would
>>> >> >>> probably do it in the LoggingConnectionDecorator, like you thought.
>>> >> If you
>>> >> >>> have issues with building a version of OpenJPA for your testing,
>>> ping
>>> >> me
>>> >> >>> back with the version of OpenJPA that you are using and maybe I can
>>> >> find
>>> >> >>> time to do a quick update. But, try the JDBC log channel first and
>>> >> see if
>>> >> >>> that gives you enough information for your specific scenario.
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> Thanks,
>>> >> >>> Kevin
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> [1]
>>> >> >>>
>>> >>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/nightly.builds/apache-openjpa-2.3.0-SNAPSHOT/docs/docbook/manual.html#ref_guide_logging_channels
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Chris Wolf <cwolf.a...@gmail.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>> I am fully aware that pooling is the way to go, but I want to just
>>> >> >>>> prove out the simple case first. Also the final deployment will
>>> be in
>>> >> >>>> a JEE container, so it will be doing the pooling.
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>> I really wish there was a logging setting to trace acquire/release
>>> of
>>> >> >>>> JDBC Connections - I looked at the source for (I forget now,
>>> something
>>> >> >>>> like JDBCDatStore) it had logging but not of acquire/release of
>>> >> >>>> Connections.
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>> What is this LoggingConnectionDecorator? would that help me log
>>> >> >>>> connection activity? If so, how is it configured?
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>> Thanks,
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>> -Chris
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Kevin Sutter <kwsut...@gmail.com
>>> >
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> >>>> > Hi Chris,
>>> >> >>>> > Normally, OpenJPA will only request a connection "on demand" [1].
>>> >> As
>>> >> >>>> each
>>> >> >>>> > database access is requested, a connection is obtained, but then
>>> >> it's
>>> >> >>>> > released when we're done with it. Unless there is some
>>> processing
>>> >> or
>>> >> >>>> > configuration that is telling OpenJPA to hang onto the
>>> >> connection... If
>>> >> >>>> > nothing jumps out at you, I would suggest tracing (maybe both
>>> >> OpenJPA and
>>> >> >>>> > database) to see why all of the connections are getting requested
>>> >> and
>>> >> >>>> > nothing is getting closed.
>>> >> >>>> >
>>> >> >>>> > As an aside, I would highly recommend the use of some type of
>>> >> connection
>>> >> >>>> > pooling. Overall, you will get much better performance if
>>> >> connections
>>> >> >>>> can
>>> >> >>>> > be re-used instead of constantly dropping and re-creating
>>> >> connections.
>>> >> >>>> > Whether you use DBCP or Oracle pooling or some application
>>> server's
>>> >> >>>> > connection pooling mechanism, it doesn't really matter. But, I
>>> >> would
>>> >> >>>> > suggest using some connection pooling.
>>> >> >>>> >
>>> >> >>>> > Good luck,
>>> >> >>>> > Kevin
>>> >> >>>> >
>>> >> >>>> > [1]
>>> >> >>>> >
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/nightly.builds/apache-openjpa-2.3.0-SNAPSHOT/docs/docbook/manual.html#ref_guide_dbsetup_retain
>>> >> >>>> >
>>> >> >>>> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Chris Wolf <
>>> cwolf.a...@gmail.com>
>>> >> >>>> wrote:
>>> >> >>>> >
>>> >> >>>> >> If I process a small number of records, everything works,
>>> however
>>> >> when
>>> >> >>>> >> I try to process a "real-world" number of records, I get an
>>> >> >>>> >> "ORA-12519". At first, I thought it was an Oracle issue and
>>> after
>>> >> >>>> >> searching around and getting hits on "solutions" involving
>>> >> increasing
>>> >> >>>> >> Oracle sessions and processes (there are at least 125
>>> configured),
>>> >> I
>>> >> >>>> >> was still getting "ORA-12519". I then tailed the TNS listener
>>> log
>>> >> and
>>> >> >>>> >> saw that everytime my OpenJPA process ran, it would consume all
>>> the
>>> >> >>>> >> JDBC connections as if it was using connection pooling with some
>>> >> high
>>> >> >>>> >> min-connections setting.
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>> >> In fact, as the stack trace shows, it's only using
>>> >> >>>> >> "SimpleDriveDataSource", which I thought didn't pool connections
>>> >> and I
>>> >> >>>> >> don't have the DBCP jar on my classpath, so why is OpenJPA
>>> opening
>>> >> all
>>> >> >>>> >> these JDBC connections?
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>> >> Thanks,
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>> >> Chris
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>> >> 183 marketdata INFO [main] openjpa.Runtime - Starting
>>> OpenJPA
>>> >> 2.2.1
>>> >> >>>> >> 214 marketdata INFO [main] openjpa.jdbc.JDBC - Using
>>> dictionary
>>> >> >>>> >> class "org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.sql.OracleDictionary".
>>> >> >>>> >> Exception in thread "main" <openjpa-2.2.1-r422266:1396819 fatal
>>> >> store
>>> >> >>>> >> error> org.apache.openjpa.persistence.RollbackException:
>>> Listener
>>> >> >>>> >> refused the connection with the following error:
>>> >> >>>> >> ORA-12519, TNS:no appropriate service handler found
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.persistence.EntityManagerImpl.commit(EntityManagerImpl.java:594)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> ms.algo.adapt.test.BeanIODemo.saveToDB(BeanIODemo.java:153)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> ms.algo.adapt.test.BeanIODemo.beanIOTest(BeanIODemo.java:127)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> ms.algo.adapt.test.BeanIODemo.main(BeanIODemo.java:50)
>>> >> >>>> >> Caused by: <openjpa-2.2.1-r422266:1396819 fatal general error>
>>> >> >>>> >> org.apache.openjpa.persistence.PersistenceException: Listener
>>> >> refused
>>> >> >>>> >> the connection with the following error:
>>> >> >>>> >> ORA-12519, TNS:no appropriate service handler found
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.sql.DBDictionary.narrow(DBDictionary.java:4958)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.sql.DBDictionary.newStoreException(DBDictionary.java:4918)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.sql.SQLExceptions.getStore(SQLExceptions.java:136)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.sql.SQLExceptions.getStore(SQLExceptions.java:110)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.sql.SQLExceptions.getStore(SQLExceptions.java:62)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.JDBCStoreManager.connect(JDBCStoreManager.java:971)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.JDBCStoreManager.getConnection(JDBCStoreManager.java:240)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.AbstractJDBCSeq.getConnection(AbstractJDBCSeq.java:163)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.NativeJDBCSeq.allocateInternal(NativeJDBCSeq.java:217)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.NativeJDBCSeq.nextInternal(NativeJDBCSeq.java:201)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.AbstractJDBCSeq.next(AbstractJDBCSeq.java:60)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> org.apache.openjpa.util.ImplHelper.generateValue(ImplHelper.java:160)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.util.ImplHelper.generateFieldValue(ImplHelper.java:144)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.JDBCStoreManager.assignField(JDBCStoreManager.java:778)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> org.apache.openjpa.util.ApplicationIds.assign(ApplicationIds.java:493)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> org.apache.openjpa.util.ApplicationIds.assign(ApplicationIds.java:469)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.JDBCStoreManager.assignObjectId(JDBCStoreManager.java:762)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.DelegatingStoreManager.assignObjectId(DelegatingStoreManager.java:135)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.StateManagerImpl.assignObjectId(StateManagerImpl.java:600)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.SingleFieldManager.preFlushPC(SingleFieldManager.java:803)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.SingleFieldManager.preFlushPCs(SingleFieldManager.java:762)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.SingleFieldManager.preFlush(SingleFieldManager.java:664)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.SingleFieldManager.preFlush(SingleFieldManager.java:589)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.SingleFieldManager.preFlush(SingleFieldManager.java:505)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.StateManagerImpl.preFlush(StateManagerImpl.java:3028)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.PNewState.beforeFlush(PNewState.java:44)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.StateManagerImpl.beforeFlush(StateManagerImpl.java:1042)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.BrokerImpl.flush(BrokerImpl.java:2114)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.BrokerImpl.flushSafe(BrokerImpl.java:2074)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.BrokerImpl.beforeCompletion(BrokerImpl.java:1992)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.LocalManagedRuntime.commit(LocalManagedRuntime.java:81)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.BrokerImpl.commit(BrokerImpl.java:1516)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.DelegatingBroker.commit(DelegatingBroker.java:933)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.persistence.EntityManagerImpl.commit(EntityManagerImpl.java:570)
>>> >> >>>> >> ... 3 more
>>> >> >>>> >> Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: Listener refused the
>>> connection
>>> >> with
>>> >> >>>> >> the following error:
>>> >> >>>> >> ORA-12519, TNS:no appropriate service handler found
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CConnection.logon(T4CConnection.java:517)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> oracle.jdbc.driver.PhysicalConnection.<init>(PhysicalConnection.java:557)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CConnection.<init>(T4CConnection.java:233)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CDriverExtension.getConnection(T4CDriverExtension.java:29)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver.connect(OracleDriver.java:556)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.schema.SimpleDriverDataSource.getSimpleConnection(SimpleDriverDataSource.java:84)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.schema.AutoDriverDataSource.getConnection(AutoDriverDataSource.java:39)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.schema.SimpleDriverDataSource.getConnection(SimpleDriverDataSource.java:76)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.lib.jdbc.DelegatingDataSource.getConnection(DelegatingDataSource.java:118)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.lib.jdbc.DecoratingDataSource.getConnection(DecoratingDataSource.java:93)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.lib.jdbc.DelegatingDataSource.getConnection(DelegatingDataSource.java:118)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.schema.DataSourceFactory$DefaultsDataSource.getConnection(DataSourceFactory.java:304)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.JDBCStoreManager.connectInternal(JDBCStoreManager.java:982)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.JDBCStoreManager.connect(JDBCStoreManager.java:967)
>>> >> >>>> >> ... 31 more
>>> >> >>>> >> Caused by: oracle.net.ns.NetException: Listener refused the
>>> >> connection
>>> >> >>>> >> with the following error:
>>> >> >>>> >> ORA-12519, TNS:no appropriate service handler found
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>> >> at oracle.net.ns.NSProtocol.connect(NSProtocol.java:457)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CConnection.connect(T4CConnection.java:1625)
>>> >> >>>> >> at
>>> >> >>>> oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CConnection.logon(T4CConnection.java:365)
>>> >> >>>> >> ... 44 more
>>> >> >>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >>
>>>
