Barbara and Andy replied: 

[...]
> >>
> >> I want to place a graphic on the 'paper', at the very bottom, 
> >> full-width (edge-to-edge... would bleed if the printer allowed).
> >>
> >> I want it to appear on every page, faded to about 30%.
> >>
> >> I want it to not interfere in any way with text or graphics on my 
> >> working page (in the text area).
> >> Insert > Picture > from file doesn't seem to do that.
> >>
> >> Format > Page > Background > [graphic tab] won't let me place the 
> >> imported graphic outside the page margins. It insists on 
> putting it 
> >> UP from the bottom and IN from the sides of the sheet of paper 
> >> background.  I can't see any options or selections to get 
> past this.
> >> What is the procedure to impose what English speakers would really 
> >> recognize as a "watermark" and not just "some graphic, 
> sorta in back, 
> >> inside the margins" ??
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >
> > Kevin,
> >
> > Have you tried using the "Footer" for what you describe?  
> Under Format 
> > -> Page -> Footer -> More there is an option to use a background 
> > graphic in the footer region.  It does not seem to allow 
> the "bleed" 
> > that your asking for but there may be other options that 
> you can try.
> >
> > Andy
> 
> I think as long as the graphic's anchor is in the header or 
> footer, the 
> graphic itself can be dragged wherever you want it.


I'll start with Andy's suggestion and then Barbara's comment.

It ends up with the same choice dialog (defaults to a 
background color selection, but with option to choose 
"Graphic" instead). Then, the browse-to-graphic and 
position-graphic sub-dialog is the same as for 
Format > Page > Background 

I browse to my file and select it, then I have 
the positioning option. The preview shows my 
graphic on the page, about 1/5 up from the bottom.

Using the "Type" selector, I choose "Position" and 
the locator tool comes alive. I click the 'handle' 
dot at bottom-center or bottom-left... nothing at 
all happens in the preview.  In fact, clicking ANY 
of the position dots has no effect on the position 
of the thumbnail graphic in the preview. 

The other two options under "Type" on the "Page Style" 
dialog are "Area" and "Tile". They produce no visible 
change in the preview. 

In all three cases, "Position", "Area", or "Tile", 
the effect upon closing the dialogs is the same. 
The graphic appears on my page... but inside the 
margins.  I want it outside/below the margins -- 
it would /o/v/e/r/l/a/p/... er... underlap the 
text area (in the margins) of the page, but 
only incidentally, and it should be entirely 
unconnected and unaffected by anything in my 
document content.   Sorta like a real watermark, 
which is an attribute of the paper that you 
print on, and not of your document. 

I asked this a couple of years ago, and have been 
using the header (possibly at Barbara's suggestion 
back then?? ), but it does _not_ isolate the 
"watermark" graphic. 

When body text flows on top of the "header" image, 
it looks fine until I start to do things in the 
document (sometimes just scrolling, or having an 
OOo dialog box open in that area. The text becomes 
invisible, as though obscured by the graphic. 

I cannot select text in that area with the mouse. 
I can insert the cursor with the mouse, but all 
text selection in the area of that header/footer 
graphic (which takes up roughly the bottom third of 
the page) must be done via the arrow keys. 
As often as not, the text remains invisible while 
I'm selecting, so all I see is the highlight block 
in the shape of the text... so I'm kinda guessing 
when I do a selection that way. 

I can click the graphic to select it, and then 
I can "Format > Arrange > Send to back" all day 
long. The result is always the same. The selected 
graphic goes 'under' the text, making that portion 
of text visible... until I de-select the graphic, 
at which point it obscures the text again. 

As I said, I've been living with this for a couple 
of years, but this document (and several like it) 
are updated frequently, so I wrestle with this 
same nonsense just about weekly.  It's getting old. 

The 'obvious' solution is a real watermark function 
that would let the graphic just live on the 
underlying workspace/paper and not be part of the 
working portion of the document. 

Before you ask, "Wrap" is set to "Through" - though 
I've tried other options, which made things worse.
On that same "Wrap" tab, under Options, the "In 
background" box is checked (yes, I tried it un-checked 
too, just to see... no joy).

The documents are not long or complicated (no ToCs, 
no cross-references, etc.) so I'm going to try 
experimenting with my new toy, Adobe InDesign. 
Perhaps it will give me less grief. 

Thanks,

 - Kevin 


The information contained in this electronic mail transmission 
may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected 
from disclosure. If you have received this communication in 
error, please notify us immediately by replying to this 
message and deleting it from your computer without copying 
or disclosing it.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.org

Reply via email to