In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Roorda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The subject line of the message to which you replied was "[users] Re: > Top versus bottom posting yet again". So, a new thread was started, > just as you ask. What more do you want? Please pay attention.
> Jonathan Kaye wrote: > > Sorry but I was following the thread about OOo popup interference and > > now I get this? Please don't hijack threads. Start a new one if you > > like. Thank you, Jonathan Clicking on Reply and changing the Subject line does NOT constitute starting a new thread. It retains the reference to the message you replied to.* To start a new thread you need to open a new email to the OOo list and send your message in that. Does it matter? Well, those of us using threaded news readers suddenly came across your message in a list of messages on a different topic (as complained about by Jonathan). Annoying, but no big deal perhaps, but anybody not interested in the 'pop-up' thread would have missed your message altogether. One is tempted to say 'pay attention'. R *Hint - the Reference and In-Reply-To headers of your message read as follows: References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The latter was a message from Dotan Cohen entitled: "OOo popup interfering with work". **A threaded newsreader presents messages according to the messages they are replying to by following the reference headers, not according to subject lines. -- Richard Travers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Truro, Cornwall --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
