On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:35:42 -0800 Joe Conner wrote: > Scott Meyers wrote: > > John W. Kennedy wrote: > >> Harold Fuchs wrote: > >>> Wouldn't he have to do that for every occurrence, just in case one > >>> occurrence overflowed a line without him noticing? > >> > >> Unfortunately, yes. > > > > The same is largely true of the "no-width no break" solution, except > > that that approach is more amenable to global search and replace, I > > think. > > > > The real problem here is that my definition of a word seems to be > > different from OO's (my definition includes "+" signs, not to > > mention underbars), and, as far as I know, there is no way to tell > > OO which characters make up a word. > > > > Scott > Perhaps an alt or control hot key combination (maybe alt + for > example) could automatically generate C++ with the no-width no-break > combination. >
Auto text replace C++ with the C[nwnb]+[nwnb]+ combination. It could be added to the list. -- Michael All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well - Julian of Norwich 1342 - 1416 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
