On 16 May 2008 at 22:05, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Am 2008-05-15 17:35:06, schrieb James Knott: > > Larry Gusaas wrote: > > > > > >The problem is allowing unsubscribed postes to the list in the first > > >place. If they are allowed, at least their address should be added to > > >the 'Reply-To' header. Having to look to see if a post is delivered to > > >the moderator before replying is idiotic. > > > > > > > Does reply to support multiple addresses? > > NO. This is why "Mail-Followup-To:" exist.
Yes. RFC2822: "an optional reply-to field MAY also be included, which contains the field name "Reply-To" and a comma-separated list of one or more addresses." -- Permission for this mail to be processed by any third party in connection with marketing or advertising purposes is hereby explicitly denied. http://www.scottsonline.org.uk lists incoming sites blocked because of spam [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Scott, Harlow, Essex, England --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
