On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote: >> Nonetheless, your e-mail confirms my suspicion that there is hard limit >> encoded in Calc. the next logical thought for me, at least, is, "Is there a >> similar limitation in the number of rows that can be createdmaybe I'll test >> this hypothesis when I have time)?"
> You mean the number of rows in a Calc document? I think that you are limited > to 64K rows. If a user wants to compile the code themselves, there is a patch that enables one to specify a larger number of rows, and columns. Stability of the resulting program is not guaranteed. I don't remember if the cause of the crash is pointers that are out of range, or insufficient memory. xan jonathon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
