So, we can say that dedup has more disadvantages than advantages.
And what about dedup of Netapp?
Jose
----- Original Message -----
From: "Karli Sjöberg" <karli.sjob...@slu.se>
To: supo...@logicworks.pt
Cc: "Jiri Belka" <jbe...@redhat.com>, users@ovirt.org
Sent: Quinta-feira, 30 de Maio de 2013 8:33:19
Subject: Re: [Users] deduplication
ons 2013-05-29 klockan 09:59 +0100 skrev supo...@logicworks.pt:
Absolutely agree with you, planning is the best thing to do, but normally
people want a plug'n'play system with all included, because there is not much
time to think and planning, and there are many companies that know how to take
advantage of this people characteristics.
Any way, I think another solution for dedup is FreeNAS using ZFS.
FreeNAS is just FreeBSD with a fancy web-ui ontop, so it´s neither more or less
of ZFS than you would have otherwise, And regarding dedup in ZFS; Just don´t,
it´s not worth it! It´s said that it may increase performance when you have a
very suitable usecase, e.g. everything exactly the same over and over. What´s
not said is that scrubbing and resilvering slows down to a snail (from hundreds
of MB/s, or GB if your system is large enough, down to less than 10), just from
dedup. Also deleting snapshots of datasets that have(or have had) dedup on can
kill the entire system, and when I say kill, I mean really fubar. Been there,
regretted that... Now, compression on the other hand, you get basically for
free and gives decent savings, I highly recommend that.
/Karli
<blockquote>
Jose
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
From: "Jiri Belka" <jbe...@redhat.com>
To: supo...@logicworks.pt
Cc: users@ovirt.org
Sent: Quarta-feira, 29 de Maio de 2013 7:33:10
Subject: Re: [Users] deduplication
On Tue, 28 May 2013 14:29:05 +0100 (WEST)
supo...@logicworks.pt wrote:
> That's why I'm making this questions, to demystify some buzzwords around
> here.
> But if you have a strong and good technology why not create buzzwords to get
> into as many people as possible? without trapped them.
> Share a disk containing "static" data is a good idea, do you know from where
> I can start?
Everything depends on your needs, design planning. Maybe then sharing
disk would be better to share via NFS/iscsi. Of course if you have many
VMs each of them is different you will fail. But if you have mostly
homogeneous environment you can think about this approach. Sure you have
to have plan for upgrading "base" "static" shared OS data, you have to
have plan how to install additional software (different destination
than /usr or /usr/local)... If you already have your own build host
which builds for you OS packages and you have already your own plan for
deployment, you have done first steps. If you depend on upgrading each
machine separately from Internet, then first you should plan your
environment, configuration management etc.
Well, in many times people do not do any planning, they just think some
good technology would save their "poor" design.
j.
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
</blockquote>
--
Med Vänliga Hälsningar
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Karli Sjöberg
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Box 7079 (Visiting Address Kronåsvägen 8)
S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
Phone: +46-(0)18-67 15 66
karli.sjob...@slu.se
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
