On Tue, 2014-07-22 at 10:04 +0800, 郑勰 wrote:
> > Hi, Alan
> 
> Thanks, I know little about python, when I execute 
> 
>       ./qpid-cpp-benchmark -q 1 -s 1 -r 1 -m 200000 --summarize --repeat 5
> 
> This is the result:
>       
> send-tp               recv-tp         l-min   l-max           l-avg           
> total-tp
> 8150  8127    0.90    85.12   33.34   8112
> 8149  8134    0.75    91.78   33.08   8119
> 8118          8101    0.73    94.25   32.94   8087
> 8104  8070    0.85    105.40  34.06   8055
> 8079  8046    0.82    102.83  33.72   8031
> 
> send-tp is the toppest messages per second,  what does it mean of l-max and 
> total-to?    

send-tp is the number of messages per second sent by the sender, added
if there are many senders and you use --summarize.

recv-tp is the number of messages per second received by the receiver,
also added if many receivers.

total-tp is the total end-to-end throughput in messages per second, if
you have more than one sender/receiver/queue this is usually a little
lower than the individual tps. It calculates the total throughput over
the period of the first message sent by any sender to the last message
received by any receiver. 

l-min/max/avg are the minimum, maximum and average latency in
milliseconds.

> 
> From the result, My boss said to me:”Hnnn,  not good …”, well, a blue day …
> 
> So I want to know your result, I expect send-to and recv-tp should be at 
> least 200,000.

That will depend a lot on hardware. Also bear in mind that you can get
much higher total throughput when you have multiple senders and
receivers since the broker can process messages in parallel.

For example:

aconway@mrg32 release (trunk)$ qpid-cpp-benchmark --repeat 3 --summarize
-q 1 -s 1 -r 1 -m 10000
send-tp recv-tp l-min   l-max   l-avg   total-tp
26847   26630   0.43    13.49   5.80    25150
25998   25437   0.35    18.67   9.46    24056
27763   27728   0.15    15.01   5.44    26185

aconway@mrg32 release (trunk)$ qpid-cpp-benchmark --repeat 3 --summarize
-q 6 -s 3 -r 3 -m 10000
send-tp recv-tp l-min   l-max   l-avg   total-tp
96582   92764   6.50    229.86  93.26   80262
97851   92901   6.12    229.14  91.35   81030
99183   95358   5.89    224.20  90.07   81362

There are a number of parameters you can adjust, check qpid-send --help
and qpid-receive --help for details. You can run qpid-cpp-benchmark with
--send-arg and --receive-arg to pass arguments to the senders and
receivers.

> 
> 
> 
> 在 2014年7月22日,上午12:29,Alan Conway <acon...@redhat.com> 写道:
> 
> > On Mon, 2014-07-21 at 11:45 +0200, Jakub Scholz wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> Qpid project contains two utilities: qpid-perftest and qpid-latency-test.
> >> You can use these instead of your own program. If you use these you can
> >> share the complete command which you used to start the performance test.
> >> Right now it is not clear for example how big your messages were or what
> >> was the configuration of your receiver. So it is hard to judge the
> >> performance.
> >> 
> >> Regards
> >> Jakub
> > 
> > Those utilities are useful but a bit out of date - they use deprecated
> > APIs. 
> > 
> > You should take a look at qpid-send, qpid-receive and
> > qpid-cpp-benchmark. qpid-send and receive are quite flexible
> > general-purpse test tools for sending and receiving messages.
> > 
> > qpid-cpp-benchmark is a python script that runs multiple instances of
> > qpid-send and qpid-receive in a variety of configurations, and collects
> > latency and throughput results. 
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Alan
> > 
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
> > 
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org

Reply via email to