On Fri, 2014-07-25 at 14:48 +0000, Steve Huston wrote: > Exactly - I agree with Andrew. > > On 7/25/14, 10:46 AM, "Andrew Stitcher" <astitc...@redhat.com> wrote: > > >On Fri, 2014-07-25 at 10:30 -0400, Alan Conway wrote: > >> ... > >> So I vote for making the default build type Release. Someone who finds > >> performance sucks is more likely to leave without asking questions than > >> someone who has trouble with their debugger (and since the default > >> doesn't set -g anyway that doesn't appear to be a problem.) > >> > >> Any counter opinions? (as always, I assume silence is consent :) > > > >I think that RelWithDebInfo is more generally useful - it gives you > >nearly all the optimisation you want and debugging symbols for when you > >screw up! > >
Works for me. Did some quick benchmarks and the perf differences between Release and RelWithDebInfo are not big. One test was 2% off on throughput, 10% off on latency, but other tests didn't show any significant difference. I'll change it on Tues if nobody else objects. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
