I think, the enterprise features extracted form Karaf should be still part of Karaf project (as a sub-project) as the features should be in particular Karaf extensions which can be easily installed on vanilla Karaf. I think they are more related to Karaf than related to ServiceMix. ServiceMix will be only a custom Karaf distribution assembling the features needed for ESB. I don't think the ServiceMix distribution will include the EJB features - it will be rather installed on vanilla Karaf (adding the EJB functionality) or shipped as a custom distribution (KarafEE) than shipped with ServiceMix. I think, all enterprise features should be maintained by a Karaf subproject, which should also contain the current ServiceMix features, like Activiti.

Best regards
Krzysztof

On 11.02.2014 12:34, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
Hi,

sounds reasonable to me, we might be able to push those enterprise features
of Karaf to ServiceMix.
So have "Released" Feature descriptors available from ServiceMix and a
pre-assembled ServiceMix Container with dedicated features.
This way it's easier to have those openEJB features and other stuff that
runs on top of Karaf at one place.
For example the right now kind of "neglected" WebConsole of Karaf could be
moved here.
This way we'd have a one Console fit's them all, but again on feature
basis, so everyone is either free to install
and use it or use something different :)

regards, Achim


2014-02-11 11:55 GMT+01:00 Krzysztof Sobkowiak <[email protected]>:

Hi

In my opinion we should have a custom Karaf distribution in Apache which
assemblies Camel, CXF, ActiveMQ, some BPM (e.g. Activiti). It can still be
ServiceMix. We should only think about making ServiceMix better upgradeable
to the new Karaf kernel. I think also, we should start ServiceMix with
Karaf 3.x.

Best regards
Krzysztof



--
Krzysztof Sobkowiak

JEE & OSS Architect | Technical Architect @ Capgemini
Capgemini <http://www.pl.capgemini.com/> | Software Solutions Center <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/> | Wroclaw e-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | Twitter: @KSobkowiak

Reply via email to