On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 10:54:52AM +0200, alge wrote: > > I'm not sure if my situation with ActiveSync beeing a show stopper for > deploying SOGo is generalizable enough, what do other people think of > it? Did I miss something?
I completely agree (except we didn't let it stop the show). Configuring mobile clients without ActiveSync is too cumbersome, and my little exposure to z-push didn't convince me it was production ready.. Is there anything we can do to get Inverse to focus on ActiveSync support? Does it need funding? Is it a big difficult feature, or ..? -jf -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
