> It seems a critical bug : if this is the result expected, a big > warning should be printed before the execution, otherwise a patch is > needed to keep user data safe.
For each of those “combined” migration scripts I just added a big fat warning that prompts the user, to ensure nobody runs them by mistake again. Let me restate, the “combined” data model is *optional* and is not part of any standard upgrade routine. -- Patrice Levesque pleves...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 *140 :: http://inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://sogo.nu) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature