> It seems a critical bug : if this is the result expected, a big
> warning should be printed before the execution, otherwise a patch is
> needed to keep user data safe.

For each of those “combined” migration scripts I just added a big fat
warning that prompts the user, to ensure nobody runs them by mistake
again.

Let me restate, the “combined” data model is *optional* and is not part
of any standard upgrade routine.



-- 
Patrice Levesque
pleves...@inverse.ca  ::  +1.514.447.4918 *140  ::  http://inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(http://packetfence.org)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to