thanks francis for the info.
we have plenty of ldap groups ( type = GroupOfUniqueNames ). all these groups do show up in the addressbook but none of does show up in the searchresult list when i try to add a user in the access rights dialog - neither for a calendar nor for an addressbook. so i guess something is configured wrong/uncomplete.
i guess that i missed something. what are the prerequisites for a group to show up?
thanks in advance, sg
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2016 at 7:48 PM
From: "\"Francis Lachapelle\" (flachape...@inverse.ca)" <users@sogo.nu>
To: users@sogo.nu
Subject: Re: [SOGo] ldap addressbooks with filter based on dynamic ldap group
From: "\"Francis Lachapelle\" (flachape...@inverse.ca)" <users@sogo.nu>
To: users@sogo.nu
Subject: Re: [SOGo] ldap addressbooks with filter based on dynamic ldap group
> On Nov 7, 2016, at 10:26 AM, sg gs (s...@mail.com) <users@sogo.nu> wrote:
>
> btw: what about group based access rights for calendars and address books? has this been implemeted/will it be implemented?
This is already supported for LDAP sources. We handle object class of type group, groupofnames, groupofuniquenames, and posixgroup.
Francis
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
>
> btw: what about group based access rights for calendars and address books? has this been implemeted/will it be implemented?
This is already supported for LDAP sources. We handle object class of type group, groupofnames, groupofuniquenames, and posixgroup.
Francis
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
