> On Nov 9, 2016, at 12:30 PM, sg gs (s...@mail.com) <users@sogo.nu> wrote: > > they all have an email address and it did not help setting > > canAuthenticate = YES; > > in the sogo groups definition.
The authentication source has to be set as "canAuthenticate" if you want to use the entries for the ACLs. Can you show us your groups source definition? > Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2016 at 10:04 AM > From: "\"Christian Mack\" (christian.m...@uni-konstanz.de)" <users@sogo.nu> > To: users@sogo.nu > Subject: Re: [SOGo] ldap addressbooks with filter based on dynamic ldap group > Hello > > Am 08.11.2016 um 19:48 schrieb Francis Lachapelle (flachape...@inverse.ca): > >> On Nov 7, 2016, at 10:26 AM, sg gs (s...@mail.com) <users@sogo.nu> wrote: > >> > >> btw: what about group based access rights for calendars and address books? > >> has this been implemeted/will it be implemented? > > > > This is already supported for LDAP sources. We handle object class of type > > group, groupofnames, groupofuniquenames, and posixgroup. > > > > Groups must have a valid email address, then they work in SOGo for > access privileges too. > > Beware that changing a group membership doesn't change the already given > privileges. > The owners of calendars and address books shared based on groups have to > apply those regularly, in order to update the privileges. > See also > https://sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=2054 > > > Kind regards, > Christian Mack -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
