On Friday 24 September 2004 08:52 am, Justin Mason wrote: > Bob Apthorpe writes: > > On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 01:30:19 -0800 John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If you are thinking about installing Spamassasin 3.0 PAY ATTENTION: > > > > > > If you haven't been reading this list carefully you will > > > have missed the fact that spamd has been moved > > > from /usr/sbin/ to /usr/bin . However, the old version remains > > > in /usr/sbin which is often where your scripts expect to find it. > > > (At least in SuSE > 8 it is so). > > > > [...] > > > > > WHY is this not in BOLD TYPE in the readme ??? > > > > Maybe the issue is OS- and version-dependent and wasn't apparent in > > testing? > > Yeah -- this is almost definitely something to do with SuSE's packaging of > either perl (if it uses the defaults from ExtUtils::MakeMaker) or > SpamAssassin itself (if its rpm spec moves the file around as Debian > does).
Except that SA on my machines have always only been installed with CPAN... -- _____________________________________ John Andersen
pgp5ObjFaDsiP.pgp
Description: signature
