We have gotten better accuracy from 3.0 as well. We use a small whitelist, stock rules, plus the conservative SARE rules (conservative meaning no supposed chance of ham), and no bigevil.
My only major complaint is the memory footprint. We use spamc/spamd, and I've reduced the number of preforks as well as having zthe spamd's die every 10 messages to reduce the memory utilization. -----Original Message----- From: Darren Coleman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 6:56 AM To: Zsolt Koppany; Spamassassin Subject: RE: more spam since upgrade Is the last line meant as some kind of threat? :) I'm sorry to say but you must have some sort of configuration issue with your install, and I'd suggest to RTFM. I upgraded from 2.64 to 3.00 and have recently less untagged spam (as expected) as a result. - Are you using any additional rulesets from www.rulesemporium.com ? If not why not? :) - Have you verified that your configuration is correct and working? (spamassassin --lint) That's a good starting point. Regards, Daz > -----Original Message----- > From: Zsolt Koppany [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 06 October 2004 11:47 > To: Spamassassin > Subject: RE: more spam since upgrade > > Hi, > > since I upgraded to 3.0.0 from 2.63 I get also much more spam and most of > them absolutely trivial for example Xiagra (I replaced 'V' with 'X'), > Xenis (I replaced 'P' with 'X') are not found either in Subject or in > Body. > > I will go back to 2.63 unless somebody can help me to fix the problem. > > Zsolt > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Thomas Kinghorn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 7:07 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: more spam since upgrade > > > > > > Hi List. > > > > I have recently upgraded toExim-4.42, Spamassassin 3.0 & sa-exim-4.1 > > > > The amount of spam slipping through since then has increased > dramatically. > > > > The scores seem a bit on the low side since upgrading. > > > > Below is the message ID and I have attached the mail from which it > > originates. > > > > Any ideas would be appreciated. > > > > Regards > > > > Tom > > > > > > > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > From: Tom Theroux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 14:26:30 +0000 > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > X-Priority: 3 > > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 > > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 > > X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 196.4.87.24 > > X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: US Students email list > > Content-Type: multipart/related; > > type="multipart/alternative"; > > boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_AC8AFB96.13499A18" > > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on jp-mx-1 > > X-Spam-Level: *** > > X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.1 required=4.4 > > tests=BAYES_50,FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS, > > > > HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_EXIST_TBODY,INVALID_TZ_GMT,URIBL_SBL, > > URIBL_WS_SURBL autolearn=no version=3.0.0 > > X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 05 Oct 2004 09:43:32 +0200) > > > > > > <<US Students email list>> > > > > >
