I haven't seen that with the upgrade, did the required_hits get raised by any chance with a new config?
Also this is off your topic but helpful are you using Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL This has worked very well for us. http://www.surbl.org/ Joey -----Original Message----- From: Zsolt Koppany [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 2:27 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: more spam since upgrade With SA-2.63 I guest that 95% or even more spam was found not approx. 70-80% and now very trival spams come through for example (I replaced 'V' and 'P' with 'X') Xiagra and Xenis. Zsolt > -----Original Message----- > From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 7:06 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: more spam since upgrade > > > > spamassassin --lint passes without any messages. Is that OK or not? > > That is good. Sounds like you have a clean set of config files. > > If the problem at this point is things leaking through (but you ARE > seeing scores, so you know things are basically working) than I would > get some SARE rules, plus some of the old standbys like tripwire and > backhair. > > If you are NOT seeing scores on any message, then you have some sort > of configuration problem in you mail chain. > > Loren > >
